Skip to content

These solved problems practice the spin-1/21/2 tools used throughout the volume: Pauli matrices, projectors, Bloch vectors, spinor rotations, Stern–Gerlach sequences, magnetic precession, and antiunitary time reversal.

Use Pauli Matrix Identity Index as the formula companion. For the conceptual pages, start with Spin-1/2 Hilbert Space, Pauli Matrices, Bloch Sphere, and Spin Rotations.

Use the SzS_z basis

∣+z⟩=(10),∣−z⟩=(01).\lvert+z\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lvert-z\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix}.

The spin operators are

Si=ℏ2σi.S_i=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_i.

For a unit vector n^\hat{\mathbf n}, the spin-component projectors are

P±(n^)=12(I±n^⋅σ).P_\pm(\hat{\mathbf n}) = \frac12 \left( I\pm\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right).

Spinor rotations are

U(n^,θ)=exp⁡(−iθ2n^⋅σ).U(\hat{\mathbf n},\theta) = \exp \left( -\frac{i\theta}{2}\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right).

1. Arbitrary-Axis Stern–Gerlach Probability

Section titled “1. Arbitrary-Axis Stern–Gerlach Probability”

An incoming beam is prepared in ∣+z⟩\lvert+z\rangle. A Stern–Gerlach analyzer is oriented along

n^=(sin⁡θ,0,cos⁡θ).\hat{\mathbf n} = (\sin\theta,0,\cos\theta).

Find the probabilities for the +n^+\hat{\mathbf n} and −n^-\hat{\mathbf n} outputs.

Solution

The +n^+\hat{\mathbf n} projector is

P+(n^)=12(I+n^⋅σ).P_+(\hat{\mathbf n}) = \frac12 \left( I+\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right).

The state ∣+z⟩\lvert+z\rangle has Bloch vector z^\hat{\mathbf z}, so

p+=12(1+z^⋅n^)=12(1+cos⁡θ)=cos⁡2θ2.p_+ = \frac12 \left( 1+\hat{\mathbf z}\cdot\hat{\mathbf n} \right) = \frac12(1+\cos\theta) = \cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}.

Similarly,

p−=12(1−cos⁡θ)=sin⁡2θ2.p_- = \frac12(1-\cos\theta) = \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}.

The half-angle appears because spinors double-cover ordinary directions.

Let

∣ψ⟩=cos⁡θ2∣+z⟩+eiϕsin⁡θ2∣−z⟩.\lvert\psi\rangle = \cos\frac{\theta}{2}\lvert+z\rangle + e^{i\phi}\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\lvert-z\rangle.

Compute ⟨σx⟩\langle\sigma_x\rangle, ⟨σy⟩\langle\sigma_y\rangle, and ⟨σz⟩\langle\sigma_z\rangle.

Solution

Write

a=cos⁡θ2,b=eiϕsin⁡θ2.a=\cos\frac{\theta}{2}, \qquad b=e^{i\phi}\sin\frac{\theta}{2}.

Then

⟨σx⟩=a∗b+b∗a=2Re⁡(a∗b)=sin⁡θcos⁡ϕ.\langle\sigma_x\rangle = a^*b+b^*a = 2\operatorname{Re}(a^*b) = \sin\theta\cos\phi.

Similarly,

⟨σy⟩=−ia∗b+ib∗a=2Im⁡(a∗b)=sin⁡θsin⁡ϕ.\langle\sigma_y\rangle = -ia^*b+ib^*a = 2\operatorname{Im}(a^*b) = \sin\theta\sin\phi.

Finally,

⟨σz⟩=∣a∣2−∣b∣2=cos⁡2θ2−sin⁡2θ2=cos⁡θ.\langle\sigma_z\rangle = \lvert a\rvert^2-\lvert b\rvert^2 = \cos^2\frac{\theta}{2} - \sin^2\frac{\theta}{2} = \cos\theta.

Thus the Bloch vector is

n^=(sin⁡θcos⁡ϕ,sin⁡θsin⁡ϕ,cos⁡θ).\hat{\mathbf n} = (\sin\theta\cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,\cos\theta).

A beam is prepared in ∣+z⟩\lvert+z\rangle. It passes through an xx-oriented Stern–Gerlach analyzer, and the +x+x output is selected. That output then passes through a final zz analyzer. What are the final +z+z and −z-z probabilities conditional on passing the +x+x filter, and what fractions of the original beam reach each final output?

Solution

After the +x+x output is selected, the state is

∣+x⟩=12(∣+z⟩+∣−z⟩).\lvert+x\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \lvert+z\rangle+\lvert-z\rangle \right).

The final zz analyzer measures in the ∣+z⟩,∣−z⟩\lvert+z\rangle,\lvert-z\rangle basis, so

p(+z)=∣⟨+z∣+x⟩∣2=12,p(+z) = \left| \langle+z\vert+x\rangle \right|^2 = \frac12,

and

p(−z)=∣⟨−z∣+x⟩∣2=12.p(-z) = \left| \langle-z\vert+x\rangle \right|^2 = \frac12.

These probabilities are conditional on the selected beam. Since the +x+x filter transmits half of the incoming +z+z beam, each final output contains 1/41/4 of the original incident intensity. The conditional state no longer has a definite SzS_z.

Apply a spinor rotation about the zz axis by angle α\alpha to ∣+x⟩\lvert+x\rangle. Express the result up to an overall phase and identify the final Bloch direction.

Solution

The rotation operator is

U(z^,α)=(e−iα/200eiα/2).U(\hat z,\alpha) = \begin{pmatrix} e^{-i\alpha/2}&0\\ 0&e^{i\alpha/2} \end{pmatrix}.

Since

∣+x⟩=12(∣+z⟩+∣−z⟩),\lvert+x\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \lvert+z\rangle+\lvert-z\rangle \right),

we get

U(z^,α)∣+x⟩=12(e−iα/2∣+z⟩+eiα/2∣−z⟩).U(\hat z,\alpha)\lvert+x\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( e^{-i\alpha/2}\lvert+z\rangle + e^{i\alpha/2}\lvert-z\rangle \right).

Removing the global phase e−iα/2e^{-i\alpha/2} gives

12(∣+z⟩+eiα∣−z⟩).\frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \lvert+z\rangle + e^{i\alpha}\lvert-z\rangle \right).

This is the Bloch-sphere direction

(cos⁡α,sin⁡α,0).(\cos\alpha,\sin\alpha,0).

The spinor uses half-angles, but the Bloch vector rotates by the physical angle α\alpha.

Let

H=−γℏB02σz,H = -\frac{\gamma\hbar B_0}{2}\sigma_z,

and define ω=γB0\omega=\gamma B_0. If the initial state is ∣+x⟩\lvert+x\rangle, compute ⟨σx⟩(t)\langle\sigma_x\rangle(t) and ⟨σy⟩(t)\langle\sigma_y\rangle(t).

Solution

The time-evolution operator is

U(t)=exp⁡(−iHtℏ)=exp⁡(iωt2σz).U(t) = \exp\left(-\frac{iHt}{\hbar}\right) = \exp\left(\frac{i\omega t}{2}\sigma_z\right).

Acting on ∣+x⟩\lvert+x\rangle,

∣ψ(t)⟩=12(eiωt/2∣+z⟩+e−iωt/2∣−z⟩).\lvert\psi(t)\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( e^{i\omega t/2}\lvert+z\rangle + e^{-i\omega t/2}\lvert-z\rangle \right).

Up to a global phase, this is

12(∣+z⟩+e−iωt∣−z⟩).\frac{1}{\sqrt2} \left( \lvert+z\rangle + e^{-i\omega t}\lvert-z\rangle \right).

Therefore the Bloch azimuthal angle is −ωt-\omega t, so

⟨σx⟩(t)=cos⁡ωt,⟨σy⟩(t)=−sin⁡ωt.\langle\sigma_x\rangle(t)=\cos\omega t, \qquad \langle\sigma_y\rangle(t)=-\sin\omega t.

If γ\gamma is negative, then ω\omega is negative and the precession direction reverses.

Show that a 2π2\pi rotation changes every spin-1/21/2 state by −1-1, but leaves all single-state measurement probabilities unchanged.

Solution

For any axis n^\hat{\mathbf n},

U(n^,2π)=cos⁡π I−isin⁡π n^⋅σ=−I.U(\hat{\mathbf n},2\pi) = \cos\pi\,I -i\sin\pi\,\hat{\mathbf n}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma = -I.

Thus

∣ψ⟩↦−∣ψ⟩.\lvert\psi\rangle \mapsto -\lvert\psi\rangle.

For a projector PP, the probability becomes

⟨−ψ∣P∣−ψ⟩=⟨ψ∣P∣ψ⟩.\langle-\psi\vert P\vert-\psi\rangle = \langle\psi\vert P\vert\psi\rangle.

The ray is unchanged. The sign can matter only when it becomes a relative phase compared with another branch or reference path.

Let ∣+a^⟩\lvert+\hat{\mathbf a}\rangle and ∣+b^⟩\lvert+\hat{\mathbf b}\rangle be spin-up states along two unit vectors a^\hat{\mathbf a} and b^\hat{\mathbf b}. Show that

∣⟨+b^∣+a^⟩∣2=12(1+a^⋅b^).\left| \langle+\hat{\mathbf b}\vert+\hat{\mathbf a}\rangle \right|^2 = \frac12 \left( 1+\hat{\mathbf a}\cdot\hat{\mathbf b} \right).
Solution

The projector onto spin up along b^\hat{\mathbf b} is

P+(b^)=12(I+b^⋅σ).P_+(\hat{\mathbf b}) = \frac12 \left( I+\hat{\mathbf b}\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma \right).

The state ∣+a^⟩\lvert+\hat{\mathbf a}\rangle has Bloch vector a^\hat{\mathbf a}, so

⟨+a^∣σ∣+a^⟩=a^.\langle+\hat{\mathbf a}\vert \boldsymbol\sigma \vert+\hat{\mathbf a}\rangle = \hat{\mathbf a}.

Therefore

∣⟨+b^∣+a^⟩∣2=⟨+a^∣P+(b^)∣+a^⟩=12(1+a^⋅b^).\left| \langle+\hat{\mathbf b}\vert+\hat{\mathbf a}\rangle \right|^2 = \langle+\hat{\mathbf a}\vert P_+(\hat{\mathbf b}) \vert+\hat{\mathbf a}\rangle = \frac12 \left( 1+\hat{\mathbf a}\cdot\hat{\mathbf b} \right).

If the angle between the directions is γ\gamma, this is cos⁡2(γ/2)\cos^2(\gamma/2).

Use

Θ=−iσyK,\Theta=-i\sigma_yK,

where KK complex conjugates components in the SzS_z basis. Compute Θ∣+z⟩\Theta\lvert+z\rangle, Θ∣−z⟩\Theta\lvert-z\rangle, and Θ2∣+z⟩\Theta^2\lvert+z\rangle.

Solution

In the SzS_z basis,

∣+z⟩=(10),∣−z⟩=(01).\lvert+z\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lvert-z\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix}.

Since these basis vectors are real, KK leaves their components unchanged. Also

−iσy=(0−110).-i\sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0&-1\\ 1&0 \end{pmatrix}.

Thus

Θ∣+z⟩=∣−z⟩,\Theta\lvert+z\rangle = \lvert-z\rangle,

and

Θ∣−z⟩=−∣+z⟩.\Theta\lvert-z\rangle = -\lvert+z\rangle.

Applying Θ\Theta twice gives

Θ2∣+z⟩=Θ∣−z⟩=−∣+z⟩.\Theta^2\lvert+z\rangle = \Theta\lvert-z\rangle = -\lvert+z\rangle.

The minus sign is the spin-1/21/2 result Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I.

  • L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
  • C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.