These solved problems practice angular-momentum algebra as a working tool: ladder operators, orbital eigenfunctions, central-potential labels, coupled bases, and spin–orbit shifts.
Use Angular Momentum Identity Index as the formula companion. For focused lookup, use Spherical Harmonics Quick Reference and Clebsch–Gordan Quick Reference . The canonical derivations live in Ladder Operators , Central Potentials and Rotational Symmetry , and Spin–Orbit Coupling .
The angular momentum algebra is
[ J i , J j ] = i ℏ ∑ k ϵ i j k J k , ϵ x y z = + 1. [J_i,J_j]
=
i\hbar\sum_k\epsilon_{ijk}J_k,
\qquad
\epsilon_{xyz}=+1. [ J i , J j ] = i ℏ k ∑ ϵ ij k J k , ϵ x y z = + 1.
The standard basis satisfies
J 2 ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ 2 j ( j + 1 ) ∣ j , m ⟩ , J z ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ m ∣ j , m ⟩ . J^2\lvert j,m\rangle
=
\hbar^2j(j+1)\lvert j,m\rangle,
\qquad
J_z\lvert j,m\rangle
=
\hbar m\lvert j,m\rangle. J 2 ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ 2 j ( j + 1 ) ∣ j , m ⟩ , J z ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ m ∣ j , m ⟩ .
With
J ± = J x ± i J y , J_\pm=J_x\pm iJ_y, J ± = J x ± i J y ,
the ladder action is
J ± ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m ± 1 ) ∣ j , m ± 1 ⟩ . J_\pm\lvert j,m\rangle
=
\hbar
\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m\pm1)}
\lvert j,m\pm1\rangle. J ± ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m ± 1 ) ∣ j , m ± 1 ⟩ .
For orbital angular momentum, write j → ℓ j\to\ell j → ℓ and J i → L i J_i\to L_i J i → L i . Spherical harmonics obey
L 2 Y ℓ m = ℏ 2 ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) Y ℓ m , L z Y ℓ m = ℏ m Y ℓ m . L^2Y_\ell^m
=
\hbar^2\ell(\ell+1)Y_\ell^m,
\qquad
L_zY_\ell^m
=
\hbar mY_\ell^m. L 2 Y ℓ m = ℏ 2 ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) Y ℓ m , L z Y ℓ m = ℏ m Y ℓ m .
For adding two angular momenta,
J = J 1 + J 2 , \mathbf J=\mathbf J_1+\mathbf J_2, J = J 1 + J 2 ,
and the allowed total labels are
J = ∣ j 1 − j 2 ∣ , ∣ j 1 − j 2 ∣ + 1 , … , j 1 + j 2 . J=
\lvert j_1-j_2\rvert,
\lvert j_1-j_2\rvert+1,
\ldots,
j_1+j_2. J = ∣ j 1 − j 2 ∣ , ∣ j 1 − j 2 ∣ + 1 , … , j 1 + j 2 .
Starting from
J − J + = J 2 − J z 2 − ℏ J z , J_-J_+
=
J^2-J_z^2-\hbar J_z, J − J + = J 2 − J z 2 − ℏ J z ,
derive the coefficient in
J + ∣ j , m ⟩ = C j m ( + ) ∣ j , m + 1 ⟩ J_+\lvert j,m\rangle
=
C_{jm}^{(+)}\lvert j,m+1\rangle J + ∣ j , m ⟩ = C j m ( + ) ∣ j , m + 1 ⟩
for normalized states. Explain why the coefficient vanishes at the top of the multiplet.
Solution
Take the norm of the raised state:
∥ J + ∣ j , m ⟩ ∥ 2 = ⟨ j , m ∣ J − J + ∣ j , m ⟩ . \left\lVert
J_+\lvert j,m\rangle
\right\rVert^2
=
\langle j,m|J_-J_+|j,m\rangle. ∥ J + ∣ j , m ⟩ ∥ 2 = ⟨ j , m ∣ J − J + ∣ j , m ⟩ .
Use the identity in the question and the eigenvalue equations:
⟨ j , m ∣ J − J + ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ 2 j ( j + 1 ) − ℏ 2 m 2 − ℏ 2 m = ℏ 2 [ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m + 1 ) ] . \begin{aligned}
\langle j,m|J_-J_+|j,m\rangle
&=
\hbar^2j(j+1)
-
\hbar^2m^2
-
\hbar^2m
\\
&=
\hbar^2
\left[
j(j+1)-m(m+1)
\right].
\end{aligned} ⟨ j , m ∣ J − J + ∣ j , m ⟩ = ℏ 2 j ( j + 1 ) − ℏ 2 m 2 − ℏ 2 m = ℏ 2 [ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m + 1 ) ] .
Since the states are normalized,
∣ C j m ( + ) ∣ 2 = ℏ 2 [ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m + 1 ) ] . \left|C_{jm}^{(+)}\right|^2
=
\hbar^2
\left[
j(j+1)-m(m+1)
\right]. C j m ( + ) 2 = ℏ 2 [ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m + 1 ) ] .
With the standard Condon–Shortley phase convention the coefficient is chosen real and nonnegative:
C j m ( + ) = ℏ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m + 1 ) . C_{jm}^{(+)}
=
\hbar
\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m+1)}. C j m ( + ) = ℏ j ( j + 1 ) − m ( m + 1 ) .
For m = j m=j m = j , the expression under the square root is
j ( j + 1 ) − j ( j + 1 ) = 0 , j(j+1)-j(j+1)=0, j ( j + 1 ) − j ( j + 1 ) = 0 ,
so
J + ∣ j , j ⟩ = 0. J_+\lvert j,j\rangle=0. J + ∣ j , j ⟩ = 0.
The top state is annihilated because there is no allowed state with m = j + 1 m=j+1 m = j + 1 inside the same irreducible multiplet.
For a normalized angular momentum state ∣ j , m ⟩ \lvert j,m\rangle ∣ j , m ⟩ , compute
⟨ J x 2 + J y 2 ⟩ . \langle J_x^2+J_y^2\rangle. ⟨ J x 2 + J y 2 ⟩ .
Then show that
⟨ J x ⟩ = ⟨ J y ⟩ = 0. \langle J_x\rangle=\langle J_y\rangle=0. ⟨ J x ⟩ = ⟨ J y ⟩ = 0.
Solution
Use
J 2 = J x 2 + J y 2 + J z 2 . J^2=J_x^2+J_y^2+J_z^2. J 2 = J x 2 + J y 2 + J z 2 .
Therefore
⟨ J x 2 + J y 2 ⟩ = ⟨ J 2 − J z 2 ⟩ = ℏ 2 j ( j + 1 ) − ℏ 2 m 2 = ℏ 2 [ j ( j + 1 ) − m 2 ] . \begin{aligned}
\langle J_x^2+J_y^2\rangle
&=
\langle J^2-J_z^2\rangle
\\
&=
\hbar^2j(j+1)-\hbar^2m^2
\\
&=
\hbar^2
\left[
j(j+1)-m^2
\right].
\end{aligned} ⟨ J x 2 + J y 2 ⟩ = ⟨ J 2 − J z 2 ⟩ = ℏ 2 j ( j + 1 ) − ℏ 2 m 2 = ℏ 2 [ j ( j + 1 ) − m 2 ] .
For the first moments, write
J x = 1 2 ( J + + J − ) , J y = 1 2 i ( J + − J − ) . J_x=\frac12(J_++J_-),
\qquad
J_y=\frac{1}{2i}(J_+-J_-). J x = 2 1 ( J + + J − ) , J y = 2 i 1 ( J + − J − ) .
The ladder operators map ∣ j , m ⟩ \lvert j,m\rangle ∣ j , m ⟩ to states with m ± 1 m\pm1 m ± 1 , which are orthogonal to ∣ j , m ⟩ \lvert j,m\rangle ∣ j , m ⟩ . Hence
⟨ j , m ∣ J ± ∣ j , m ⟩ = 0 , \langle j,m|J_\pm|j,m\rangle=0, ⟨ j , m ∣ J ± ∣ j , m ⟩ = 0 ,
and therefore
⟨ J x ⟩ = ⟨ J y ⟩ = 0. \langle J_x\rangle=\langle J_y\rangle=0. ⟨ J x ⟩ = ⟨ J y ⟩ = 0.
The result does not mean the transverse components have no fluctuations. Their squared sum is nonzero unless the state is the trivial j = 0 j=0 j = 0 representation.
The normalized spherical harmonic Y 2 1 Y_2^1 Y 2 1 is proportional to
sin θ cos θ e i ϕ . \sin\theta\cos\theta\,e^{i\phi}. sin θ cos θ e i ϕ .
Use
L z = − i ℏ ∂ ∂ ϕ L_z=-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi} L z = − i ℏ ∂ ϕ ∂
to identify its m m m label. Then determine its parity.
Solution
Acting with L z L_z L z gives
L z Y 2 1 = − i ℏ ∂ ∂ ϕ [ constant ⋅ sin θ cos θ e i ϕ ] = − i ℏ [ i constant ⋅ sin θ cos θ e i ϕ ] = ℏ Y 2 1 . \begin{aligned}
L_zY_2^1
&=
-i\hbar
\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}
\left[
\text{constant}\cdot
\sin\theta\cos\theta\,e^{i\phi}
\right]
\\
&=
-i\hbar
\left[
i\,
\text{constant}\cdot
\sin\theta\cos\theta\,e^{i\phi}
\right]
\\
&=
\hbar Y_2^1.
\end{aligned} L z Y 2 1 = − i ℏ ∂ ϕ ∂ [ constant ⋅ sin θ cos θ e i ϕ ] = − i ℏ [ i constant ⋅ sin θ cos θ e i ϕ ] = ℏ Y 2 1 .
Thus m = 1 m=1 m = 1 . The ℓ \ell ℓ label is already given by the subscript ℓ = 2 \ell=2 ℓ = 2 , so
L 2 Y 2 1 = ℏ 2 2 ( 2 + 1 ) Y 2 1 = 6 ℏ 2 Y 2 1 . L^2Y_2^1
=
\hbar^2\,2(2+1)Y_2^1
=
6\hbar^2Y_2^1. L 2 Y 2 1 = ℏ 2 2 ( 2 + 1 ) Y 2 1 = 6 ℏ 2 Y 2 1 .
The parity of a scalar spherical harmonic is
( − 1 ) ℓ . (-1)^\ell. ( − 1 ) ℓ .
For ℓ = 2 \ell=2 ℓ = 2 , the parity is even:
Y 2 1 ( π − θ , ϕ + π ) = Y 2 1 ( θ , ϕ ) . Y_2^1(\pi-\theta,\phi+\pi)
=
Y_2^1(\theta,\phi). Y 2 1 ( π − θ , ϕ + π ) = Y 2 1 ( θ , ϕ ) .
The sign convention in the overall normalization does not affect the eigenvalue or parity conclusions.
A spinless particle in a generic central potential has a bound-state sector labeled by
∣ n r , ℓ , m ⟩ . \lvert n_r,\ell,m\rangle. ∣ n r , ℓ , m ⟩ .
For fixed n r n_r n r and ℓ = 3 \ell=3 ℓ = 3 , how many states are related by rotational symmetry? Which operators form a natural commuting set? If a spin-1 / 2 1/2 1/2 degree of freedom is added but the Hamiltonian remains spin independent, what is the degeneracy before spin–orbit coupling?
Solution
For fixed ℓ \ell ℓ , the magnetic label is
m = − ℓ , − ℓ + 1 , … , ℓ . m=-\ell,-\ell+1,\ldots,\ell. m = − ℓ , − ℓ + 1 , … , ℓ .
For ℓ = 3 \ell=3 ℓ = 3 , this gives
m = − 3 , − 2 , − 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , m=-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3, m = − 3 , − 2 , − 1 , 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 ,
so there are
2 ℓ + 1 = 7 2\ell+1=7 2 ℓ + 1 = 7
states in the orbital multiplet.
For a spinless central Hamiltonian, a natural commuting set is
H , L 2 , L z . H,\quad L^2,\quad L_z. H , L 2 , L z .
The choice of L z L_z L z is a basis convention inside the rotational multiplet; no physical z z z direction is selected by a pure central potential.
If a spin-1 / 2 1/2 1/2 degree of freedom is added without spin-dependent terms, the Hilbert space is the orbital multiplet tensored with a two-dimensional spin space. The degeneracy becomes
( 2 ℓ + 1 ) ( 2 s + 1 ) = 7 ⋅ 2 = 14. (2\ell+1)(2s+1)
=
7\cdot2
=
14. ( 2 ℓ + 1 ) ( 2 s + 1 ) = 7 ⋅ 2 = 14.
This is the symmetry-required multiplicity of this fixed radial/orbital sector; accidental coincidences with other sectors can enlarge the total degeneracy. This degeneracy is not all protected in the same way. The m m m degeneracy follows from spatial rotations, while the spin degeneracy follows from the absence of spin-dependent interactions.
Add angular momenta j 1 = 2 j_1=2 j 1 = 2 and j 2 = 3 / 2 j_2=3/2 j 2 = 3/2 . List the allowed total J J J values and verify the dimension count.
Solution
The allowed total angular momenta are
J = ∣ 2 − 3 2 ∣ , ∣ 2 − 3 2 ∣ + 1 , … , 2 + 3 2 . J=
\left|2-\frac32\right|,
\left|2-\frac32\right|+1,
\ldots,
2+\frac32. J = 2 − 2 3 , 2 − 2 3 + 1 , … , 2 + 2 3 .
Thus
J = 1 2 , 3 2 , 5 2 , 7 2 . J=\frac12,\frac32,\frac52,\frac72. J = 2 1 , 2 3 , 2 5 , 2 7 .
The uncoupled product space has dimension
( 2 j 1 + 1 ) ( 2 j 2 + 1 ) = ( 5 ) ( 4 ) = 20. (2j_1+1)(2j_2+1)
=
(5)(4)
=
20. ( 2 j 1 + 1 ) ( 2 j 2 + 1 ) = ( 5 ) ( 4 ) = 20.
The coupled decomposition has dimension
∑ J ( 2 J + 1 ) = ( 2 ⋅ 1 2 + 1 ) + ( 2 ⋅ 3 2 + 1 ) + ( 2 ⋅ 5 2 + 1 ) + ( 2 ⋅ 7 2 + 1 ) . \sum_J(2J+1)
=
\left(2\cdot\frac12+1\right)
+
\left(2\cdot\frac32+1\right)
+
\left(2\cdot\frac52+1\right)
+
\left(2\cdot\frac72+1\right). J ∑ ( 2 J + 1 ) = ( 2 ⋅ 2 1 + 1 ) + ( 2 ⋅ 2 3 + 1 ) + ( 2 ⋅ 2 5 + 1 ) + ( 2 ⋅ 2 7 + 1 ) .
Therefore
∑ J ( 2 J + 1 ) = 2 + 4 + 6 + 8 = 20. \sum_J(2J+1)
=
2+4+6+8
=
20. J ∑ ( 2 J + 1 ) = 2 + 4 + 6 + 8 = 20.
The dimension check confirms that the coupled basis is a reorganization of the same Hilbert space, not a new Hilbert space.
Couple j 1 = 1 j_1=1 j 1 = 1 and j 2 = 1 / 2 j_2=1/2 j 2 = 1/2 . Starting from
∣ 3 2 , 3 2 ⟩ = ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ , \left|\frac32,\frac32\right\rangle
=
\lvert 1,1\rangle
\left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle, 2 3 , 2 3 ⟩ = ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ ,
use the total lowering operator J − = J 1 − + J 2 − J_-=J_{1-}+J_{2-} J − = J 1 − + J 2 − to find the total-J = 3 / 2 J=3/2 J = 3/2 , M = 1 / 2 M=1/2 M = 1/2 state. Then find the orthogonal total-J = 1 / 2 J=1/2 J = 1/2 , M = 1 / 2 M=1/2 M = 1/2 state in the same subspace.
Solution
On the left side of a coupled-state equation, the labels are total J , M J,M J , M labels. In product states, the two kets carry the separate j 1 , m 1 j_1,m_1 j 1 , m 1 and j 2 , m 2 j_2,m_2 j 2 , m 2 labels.
On the coupled state,
J − ∣ 3 2 , 3 2 ⟩ = ℏ 3 2 ( 3 2 + 1 ) − 3 2 ( 3 2 − 1 ) ∣ 3 2 , 1 2 ⟩ . J_-\left|\frac32,\frac32\right\rangle
=
\hbar
\sqrt{
\frac32\left(\frac32+1\right)
-
\frac32\left(\frac32-1\right)
}
\left|\frac32,\frac12\right\rangle. J − 2 3 , 2 3 ⟩ = ℏ 2 3 ( 2 3 + 1 ) − 2 3 ( 2 3 − 1 ) 2 3 , 2 1 ⟩ .
The square root is
3 , \sqrt{3}, 3 ,
so
J − ∣ 3 2 , 3 2 ⟩ = ℏ 3 ∣ 3 2 , 1 2 ⟩ . J_-\left|\frac32,\frac32\right\rangle
=
\hbar\sqrt3
\left|\frac32,\frac12\right\rangle. J − 2 3 , 2 3 ⟩ = ℏ 3 2 3 , 2 1 ⟩ .
Now act on the product state:
J − ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ = ( J 1 − + J 2 − ) ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ = ℏ 2 ∣ 1 , 0 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ + ℏ ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , − 1 2 ⟩ . \begin{aligned}
J_-\,
\lvert1,1\rangle
\left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle
&=
(J_{1-}+J_{2-})
\lvert1,1\rangle
\left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle
\\
&=
\hbar\sqrt2
\lvert1,0\rangle
\left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle
+
\hbar
\lvert1,1\rangle
\left|\frac12,-\frac12\right\rangle.
\end{aligned} J − ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ = ( J 1 − + J 2 − ) ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ = ℏ 2 ∣ 1 , 0 ⟩ 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ + ℏ ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ 2 1 , − 2 1 ⟩ .
Equating the two expressions and dividing by ℏ 3 \hbar\sqrt3 ℏ 3 gives
∣ 3 2 , 1 2 ⟩ = 2 3 ∣ 1 , 0 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ + 1 3 ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , − 1 2 ⟩ . \left|\frac32,\frac12\right\rangle
=
\sqrt{\frac23}
\lvert1,0\rangle
\left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle
+
\frac{1}{\sqrt3}
\lvert1,1\rangle
\left|\frac12,-\frac12\right\rangle. 2 3 , 2 1 ⟩ = 3 2 ∣ 1 , 0 ⟩ 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ + 3 1 ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ 2 1 , − 2 1 ⟩ .
The M = 1 / 2 M=1/2 M = 1/2 uncoupled subspace is spanned by
∣ 1 , 0 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ , ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , − 1 2 ⟩ . \lvert1,0\rangle
\left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle,
\qquad
\lvert1,1\rangle
\left|\frac12,-\frac12\right\rangle. ∣ 1 , 0 ⟩ 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ , ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ 2 1 , − 2 1 ⟩ .
The normalized orthogonal state in the Condon–Shortley convention for the displayed factor order is
∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ = − 1 3 ∣ 1 , 0 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , 1 2 ⟩ + 2 3 ∣ 1 , 1 ⟩ ∣ 1 2 , − 1 2 ⟩ . \left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle
=-\frac{1}{\sqrt3}|1,0\rangle\left|\frac12,\frac12\right\rangle
+\sqrt{\frac23}|1,1\rangle\left|\frac12,-\frac12\right\rangle. 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ = − 3 1 ∣1 , 0 ⟩ 2 1 , 2 1 ⟩ + 3 2 ∣1 , 1 ⟩ 2 1 , − 2 1 ⟩ .
Its overlap with the J = 3 / 2 J=3/2 J = 3/2 state vanishes, and its norm is one. Reversing its overall sign is physically harmless, but would not match the specified table convention.
Consider the effective Hamiltonian
H S O = A L ⋅ S ℏ 2 H_{\mathrm{SO}}
=
A\,\frac{\mathbf L\cdot\mathbf S}{\hbar^2} H SO = A ℏ 2 L ⋅ S
on a fixed orbital multiplet with ℓ = 1 \ell=1 ℓ = 1 and spin s = 1 / 2 s=1/2 s = 1/2 . Find the possible energy shifts and their degeneracies.
Solution
The total angular momenta are
j = ℓ + 1 2 = 3 2 , j = ℓ − 1 2 = 1 2 . j=\ell+\frac12=\frac32,
\qquad
j=\ell-\frac12=\frac12. j = ℓ + 2 1 = 2 3 , j = ℓ − 2 1 = 2 1 .
Use
L ⋅ S = 1 2 ( J 2 − L 2 − S 2 ) . \mathbf L\cdot\mathbf S
=
\frac12
\left(
J^2-L^2-S^2
\right). L ⋅ S = 2 1 ( J 2 − L 2 − S 2 ) .
On a coupled state,
L ⋅ S ℏ 2 = 1 2 [ j ( j + 1 ) − ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) − s ( s + 1 ) ] . \frac{\mathbf L\cdot\mathbf S}{\hbar^2}
=
\frac12
\left[
j(j+1)-\ell(\ell+1)-s(s+1)
\right]. ℏ 2 L ⋅ S = 2 1 [ j ( j + 1 ) − ℓ ( ℓ + 1 ) − s ( s + 1 ) ] .
For ℓ = 1 \ell=1 ℓ = 1 , s = 1 / 2 s=1/2 s = 1/2 , and j = 3 / 2 j=3/2 j = 3/2 ,
L ⋅ S ℏ 2 = 1 2 [ 3 2 5 2 − 2 − 1 2 3 2 ] = 1 2 . \begin{aligned}
\frac{\mathbf L\cdot\mathbf S}{\hbar^2}
&=
\frac12
\left[
\frac32\frac52
-2
-\frac12\frac32
\right]
\\
&=
\frac12.
\end{aligned} ℏ 2 L ⋅ S = 2 1 [ 2 3 2 5 − 2 − 2 1 2 3 ] = 2 1 .
For j = 1 / 2 j=1/2 j = 1/2 ,
L ⋅ S ℏ 2 = 1 2 [ 1 2 3 2 − 2 − 1 2 3 2 ] = − 1. \begin{aligned}
\frac{\mathbf L\cdot\mathbf S}{\hbar^2}
&=
\frac12
\left[
\frac12\frac32
-2
-\frac12\frac32
\right]
\\
&=
-1.
\end{aligned} ℏ 2 L ⋅ S = 2 1 [ 2 1 2 3 − 2 − 2 1 2 3 ] = − 1.
Thus the shifts are
Δ E j = 3 / 2 = A 2 , Δ E j = 1 / 2 = − A . \Delta E_{j=3/2}=\frac{A}{2},
\qquad
\Delta E_{j=1/2}=-A. Δ E j = 3/2 = 2 A , Δ E j = 1/2 = − A .
Their degeneracies are
2 j + 1 = 4 and 2 j + 1 = 2. 2j+1=4
\quad
\text{and}
\quad
2j+1=2. 2 j + 1 = 4 and 2 j + 1 = 2.
The original product space has dimension
( 2 ℓ + 1 ) ( 2 s + 1 ) = 3 ⋅ 2 = 6 , (2\ell+1)(2s+1)=3\cdot2=6, ( 2 ℓ + 1 ) ( 2 s + 1 ) = 3 ⋅ 2 = 6 ,
which is exactly 4 + 2 4+2 4 + 2 .
Let two angular momenta J 1 \mathbf J_1 J 1 and J 2 \mathbf J_2 J 2 have fixed quantum numbers j 1 j_1 j 1 and j 2 j_2 j 2 . Consider
H = E 0 + A J 1 ⋅ J 2 ℏ 2 . H=E_0+A\,\frac{\mathbf J_1\cdot\mathbf J_2}{\hbar^2}. H = E 0 + A ℏ 2 J 1 ⋅ J 2 .
Which basis diagonalizes the interaction? Give the energy shift for a sector of total angular momentum J J J .
Solution
The interaction is a scalar product of the two angular momenta. It is not generally diagonal in the uncoupled basis
∣ j 1 , m 1 ⟩ ∣ j 2 , m 2 ⟩ , \lvert j_1,m_1\rangle
\lvert j_2,m_2\rangle, ∣ j 1 , m 1 ⟩ ∣ j 2 , m 2 ⟩ ,
because terms such as J 1 + J 2 − J_{1+}J_{2-} J 1 + J 2 − and J 1 − J 2 + J_{1-}J_{2+} J 1 − J 2 + can mix product states with the same total M = m 1 + m 2 M=m_1+m_2 M = m 1 + m 2 .
The coupled basis
∣ j 1 , j 2 ; J , M ⟩ \lvert j_1,j_2;J,M\rangle ∣ j 1 , j 2 ; J , M ⟩
is the natural basis. With
J = J 1 + J 2 , \mathbf J=\mathbf J_1+\mathbf J_2, J = J 1 + J 2 ,
one has
J 1 ⋅ J 2 = 1 2 ( J 2 − J 1 2 − J 2 2 ) . \mathbf J_1\cdot\mathbf J_2
=
\frac12
\left(
J^2-J_1^2-J_2^2
\right). J 1 ⋅ J 2 = 2 1 ( J 2 − J 1 2 − J 2 2 ) .
Therefore
J 1 ⋅ J 2 ℏ 2 = 1 2 [ J ( J + 1 ) − j 1 ( j 1 + 1 ) − j 2 ( j 2 + 1 ) ] \frac{\mathbf J_1\cdot\mathbf J_2}{\hbar^2}
=
\frac12
\left[
J(J+1)-j_1(j_1+1)-j_2(j_2+1)
\right] ℏ 2 J 1 ⋅ J 2 = 2 1 [ J ( J + 1 ) − j 1 ( j 1 + 1 ) − j 2 ( j 2 + 1 ) ]
on the sector with total angular momentum J J J . The energy shift is
Δ E J = A 2 [ J ( J + 1 ) − j 1 ( j 1 + 1 ) − j 2 ( j 2 + 1 ) ] . \Delta E_J
=
\frac{A}{2}
\left[
J(J+1)-j_1(j_1+1)-j_2(j_2+1)
\right]. Δ E J = 2 A [ J ( J + 1 ) − j 1 ( j 1 + 1 ) − j 2 ( j 2 + 1 ) ] .
Rotational symmetry leaves the M M M states inside a fixed J J J multiplet degenerate unless another term breaks the symmetry.
D. M. Brink and G. R. Satchler, Angular Momentum , 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 1993.
A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics , Princeton University Press, 1957.
J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics , 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, and V. K. Khersonskii, Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum , World Scientific, 1988.