Skip to content

Dynamics Reference

Use these pages to recover a dynamics formula, translate between quantum pictures, compare Green-function conventions, or find a worked derivation. Each table states the assumptions needed for its formulas. When a boundary condition or approximation matters to your calculation, follow the linked explanation.

Need Reference page What it returns
Define a term quickly Dynamics Glossary definition, limitation, and explanation
Recover a core equation Formula Sheet convention-fixed formula and route to derivation
Compare pictures, kernels, paths, and phase space Translation Table of Formulations equivalent objects and the conditions for each translation
Move states or operators between pictures Picture Translation Table dagger, sign, endpoint, and density-operator rules
Look up a standard time-domain kernel Propagator Table formula, domain, branch, and boundary reminder
Compare resolvent and response conventions Green Function Table i0i0, spectral, density-of-states, and free-kernel identities
Fix a path-integral normalization or source sign Path Integral Conventions real-time, Euclidean, measure, source, and Fourier choices
Fix a Wigner or star-product normalization Phase-Space Conventions transform, measure, marginal, and bracket conventions
Diagnose a suspicious result Common Pitfalls symptom, reason, and correction route
Choose a source or study sequence Further Reading annotated source categories and reading routes

Compare the physical problem before the notation

Section titled “Compare the physical problem before the notation”

A full-line free-particle kernel does not solve a half-line problem with a reflecting wall. For a Dirichlet wall at x=0x=0, the method of images gives, for x,y>0x,y>0,

KD(x,t;y,0)=K0(x−y,t)−K0(x+y,t),K_D(x,t;y,0)=K_0(x-y,t)-K_0(x+y,t),

where K0K_0 is the full-line free kernel. Its even dependence on its spatial argument makes KD(0,t;y,0)=0K_D(0,t;y,0)=0. The minus sign enforces the boundary condition. For a Neumann wall the image term has a plus sign instead. See Propagators and Boundary Conditions.

Convention differences need a different remedy. Two Wigner formulas may place 2πℏ2\pi\hbar factors differently while describing the same state. Two picture changes may use RR and R†R^\dagger respectively. Translate every related measure, state, and observable consistently before comparing the answers.

Check

U(t2,t0)=U(t2,t1)U(t1,t0),U(t_2,t_0) = U(t_2,t_1)U(t_1,t_0), U(t,t0)†U(t,t0)=U(t,t0)U(t,t0)†=I,U(t,t_0)^\dagger U(t,t_0)=U(t,t_0)U(t,t_0)^\dagger=I,

and

U(t0,t0)=I.U(t_0,t_0)=I.

For time-dependent Hamiltonians, determine whether time ordering is required. These structural identities are necessary checks, but an evolution generated by the wrong Hamiltonian can satisfy them too.

Check the distributional initial condition,

K(x,t0;x′,t0)=δ(x−x′),K(x,t_0;x',t_0) = \delta(x-x'),

the Schrödinger equation at the final endpoint, composition over the correct measure, and the intended boundary conditions.

Write the inverse equation and the prescription. Near the spectrum, retain the sign in

(E−H±i0)−1.(E-H\pm i0)^{-1}.

Specify whether the object is a time-domain response, an energy-domain resolvent, or a field correlation. Boundary-value signs alone do not identify all of these conventions.

State the regulator, endpoint conditions, measure, real- or imaginary-time weight, source sign, and normalization. A formal Dq\mathcal Dq does not supply these choices by itself.

Test normalization and both marginals of a Wigner function. Record the Fourier convention, phase-space measure, and star-product sign before using Moyal dynamics.

  • P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 1958.
  • E. N. Economou, Green’s Functions in Quantum Physics, 3rd ed., Springer, 2006.
  • M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, “Distribution Functions in Physics: Fundamentals,” Physics Reports 106, 121–167 (1984), doi:10.1016/0370-1573(84)90160-1.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • L. S. Schulman, Techniques and Applications of Path Integration, Dover, 2005.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.