One-Dimensional Scattering and Tunneling
Scattering asks how an incoming wave divides into reflected and transmitted parts. A finite barrier can transmit even below its height, and a potential step can reflect even above its height. This chapter derives those effects by matching wavefunctions and comparing probability currents.
Transmission measures current
Section titled “Transmission measures current”For a real, time-independent scalar potential, constant mass, and open channels on both sides, write a left-incident solution as
A wave carries current . Consequently,
The velocity factor matters: squared amplitudes alone are not generally the probabilities. If the right asymptotic region is forbidden, its admissible decaying tail carries no outgoing current. A finite forbidden barrier differs because there is a propagating region beyond its second interface.
For a rectangular barrier of width , the opaque-barrier transmission has the leading exponential , with . The amplitude decay and the probability exponent differ by a factor of two. No energy borrowing occurs in this stationary process.
Reading sequence
Section titled “Reading sequence”| Page | Central question |
|---|---|
| Potential Step | How can one finite interface reflect an above-threshold wave? |
| Finite Potential Barrier | What do two interfaces add to exact scattering? |
| Rectangular Barrier Tunneling | How does forbidden-region opacity control transmission? |
| Transfer Matrix Method | How are many interfaces composed systematically and stably? |
| Reflection and Transmission Coefficients | Why are scattering probabilities current ratios? |
| Resonant Transmission | How do quasi-bound states create narrow transparency windows? |
| Quantum Tunneling | Which phenomena count as tunneling, and what common stories are misleading? |
| Scattering from a Delta Potential | How does a point interaction encode scattering and a bound-state pole? |
| Wave Packets and Scattering | How do stationary amplitudes become late-time particle probabilities? |
| Tunneling Applications: First Encounters | Which part of elementary tunneling survives in real applications? |
| One-Dimensional Scattering Revisited | How do these models fit into -matrix, pole, resonance, and semiclassical language? |
From one interface to resonances
Section titled “From one interface to resonances”Read current ratios and the potential step before the finite barrier. Transfer matrices organize multiple interfaces, while resonant transmission explains how a leaky intermediate state can produce a sharp peak. For a prepared packet, average over its incident spectrum; one monochromatic transmission value is accurate only over a sufficiently narrow bandwidth.
The scattering volume develops channel matrices, poles, and general collision theory. Semiclassical barrier penetration extends the elementary exponential to smoothly varying barriers.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”At a step with , matching gives and . Are these amplitudes physically allowed?
Solution
Yes. and , so current is conserved. A transmitted amplitude larger than one is compatible with a smaller transmitted velocity. Calling the transmission probability would give the wrong answer.
References
Section titled “References”- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- S. Datta, Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed., Pergamon, 1977.
- E. Merzbacher, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Wiley, 1998.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- J. R. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Dover, 2006.