Skip to content

Time Reversal for Spinless Particles

For a spinless particle with scalar wavefunction ψ(x)\psi(\mathbf x), the simplest time-reversal operator is complex conjugation in the position representation:

Θ=K,(Θψ)(x)=ψ(x)∗.\Theta=K, \qquad (\Theta\psi)(\mathbf x)=\psi(\mathbf x)^*.

This is the prototype of time reversal with

Θ2=+I.\Theta^2=+I.

It is simpler than the spin-1/21/2 case because there is no intrinsic spinor index that must rotate when time is reversed. The physical content is still nontrivial: Θ\Theta is antiunitary, it reverses momentum and orbital angular momentum, and it constrains Hamiltonians to be real in an appropriate basis.

“Spinless” here means a single scalar particle in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, with no internal spin degree of freedom and no extra internal matrix on which time reversal acts. The Hilbert space is typically

L2(Rd)L^2(\mathbb R^d)

with a self-adjoint Hamiltonian domain, or a corresponding space on a finite region. The boundary conditions are part of the symmetry test. In the usual position basis, position eigenkets can be chosen so that time reversal leaves the spatial point unchanged:

Θ∣x⟩=∣x⟩.\Theta\lvert \mathbf x\rangle = \lvert \mathbf x\rangle.

Then the wavefunction action is just complex conjugation.

This does not mean every effective “spinless” model is time-reversal invariant. Magnetic fluxes, complex hopping phases, absorbing optical potentials, and rotating frames can break the symmetry even without spin.

Position acts by multiplication:

(Xiψ)(x)=xiψ(x).(X_i\psi)(\mathbf x)=x_i\psi(\mathbf x).

Since xix_i is real,

KXiK−1=Xi.KX_iK^{-1}=X_i.

Momentum is

Pi=−iℏ∂∂xi.P_i=-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}.

Complex conjugation changes ii to −i-i, so

KPiK−1=−Pi.KP_iK^{-1}=-P_i.

Thus spinless time reversal has the expected even and odd variables:

ΘXΘ−1=X,ΘPΘ−1=−P.\Theta\mathbf X\Theta^{-1} = \mathbf X, \qquad \Theta\mathbf P\Theta^{-1} = -\mathbf P.

Orbital angular momentum is therefore time-reversal odd:

ΘLΘ−1=Θ(X×P)Θ−1=−L.\Theta\mathbf L\Theta^{-1} = \Theta(\mathbf X\times\mathbf P)\Theta^{-1} = -\mathbf L.

This is a useful contrast with parity. Parity reverses both X\mathbf X and P\mathbf P, so L\mathbf L is parity even; time reversal leaves X\mathbf X fixed and reverses P\mathbf P, so L\mathbf L is time-reversal odd.

The compact formula Θ=K\Theta=K belongs to the position representation. In momentum space, time reversal must also flip the momentum label. If

ψ~(p)=⟨p∣ψ⟩,\widetilde\psi(\mathbf p) = \langle \mathbf p|\psi\rangle,

then the transformed wavefunction is

(Θψ~)(p)=ψ~(−p)∗,(\Theta\widetilde\psi)(\mathbf p) = \widetilde\psi(-\mathbf p)^*,

up to the phase convention chosen for momentum eigenkets. This is the same physical operator written in a different representation.

The basis dependence of KK is discussed more generally in Antiunitary Time Reversal.

For scalar wavefunctions,

Θ2ψ=K(Kψ)=ψ.\Theta^2\psi = K(K\psi) = \psi.

Hence

Θ2=+I.\Theta^2=+I.

This is why spinless time reversal does not force Kramers degeneracy. A time-reversal-invariant spinless Hamiltonian can have nondegenerate bound states. Degeneracies may still occur, but they must come from other symmetries, boundary conditions, or accidental structure rather than from the Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I Kramers mechanism.

Consider

H=P22m+V(X),H = \frac{\mathbf P^2}{2m}+V(\mathbf X),

with real scalar potential VV. Then

KHK−1=H.KHK^{-1}=H.

The kinetic term is invariant because P2\mathbf P^2 is unchanged, and the potential is invariant because V(x)V(\mathbf x) is real.

In a finite-dimensional basis where spinless time reversal is represented by KK, the condition

KHK−1=HKHK^{-1}=H

is simply

H∗=H.H^*=H.

If HH is also Hermitian, this means HH is a real symmetric matrix in that basis. This is the elementary finite-dimensional version of the spinless time-reversal constraint.

If HH is invariant under KK and

Hψ=Eψ,H\psi=E\psi,

then complex conjugating gives

Hψ∗=Eψ∗H\psi^*=E\psi^*

for real EE. Thus ψ∗\psi^* is another eigenfunction with the same energy.

If the eigenvalue is nondegenerate, then

ψ∗=cψ,∣c∣=1.\psi^*=c\psi, \qquad \lvert c\rvert=1.

By multiplying ψ\psi by an overall phase, one can choose a representative with

ψ∗=ψ.\psi^*=\psi.

If c=eiχc=e^{i\chi}, the rephased state eiχ/2ψe^{i\chi/2}\psi is real. This is why bound-state wavefunctions for real one-dimensional potentials and conjugation-invariant boundary conditions are often chosen real. In degenerate subspaces, the statement is not that every vector is real, but that one can choose a basis adapted to the antiunitary symmetry.

For a scalar particle without vector potential, the probability current is

j=ℏmIm⁡(ψ∗∇ψ).\mathbf j = \frac{\hbar}{m}\operatorname{Im} \left(\psi^*\nabla\psi\right).

Under Θ=K\Theta=K,

ψ↦ψ∗,j↦−j.\psi\mapsto\psi^*, \qquad \mathbf j\mapsto-\mathbf j.

Plane waves show this directly:

eik⋅x↦e−ik⋅x.e^{i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf x} \mapsto e^{-i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf x}.

The momentum and current reverse, while the probability density is unchanged.

A spinless particle can still couple to a magnetic field through minimal coupling:

H(A)=12m(P−qA(X))2+qΦ(X).H(\mathbf A) = \frac{1}{2m} \left(\mathbf P-q\mathbf A(\mathbf X)\right)^2 +q\Phi(\mathbf X).

For real A\mathbf A and Φ\Phi,

ΘH(A)Θ−1=H(−A),\Theta H(\mathbf A)\Theta^{-1} = H(-\mathbf A),

up to the usual gauge convention. Equivalently, the magnetic field is time-reversal odd:

B↦−B.\mathbf B\mapsto-\mathbf B.

Therefore a fixed nonzero magnetic field generally breaks ordinary time reversal even without spin. A nonzero vector potential by itself is not enough: a pure gauge can be removed, and some fluxes are equivalent to their negatives by a single-valued gauge transformation. The test is physical field and holonomy together with the operator domain, not merely whether A\mathbf A appears in a formula.

Real Differential Expression, Nonreal Boundary Condition

Section titled “Real Differential Expression, Nonreal Boundary Condition”

Consider the free Hamiltonian on a ring of length LL, represented on [0,L][0,L] with a twist:

H=−ℏ22md2dx2,ψ(L)=eiαψ(0),ψ′(L)=eiαψ′(0).H=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2},\qquad \psi(L)=e^{i\alpha}\psi(0),\quad \psi'(L)=e^{i\alpha}\psi'(0).

Its differential expression is real, but KK changes the twist to −α-\alpha. The domain is invariant only when eiα=e−iαe^{i\alpha}=e^{-i\alpha}, meaning α=0\alpha=0 or π\pi modulo 2π2\pi. This is a simple example of why checking the coefficients of HH does not finish the symmetry test. In a flux description these cases correspond to an integer or half-integer flux quantum, where reversing the flux gives a gauge-equivalent ring problem.

Spinless time reversal maps an outgoing wave to an incoming wave with reversed momentum. For a real potential, this relates time-reversed scattering processes. For example, in one dimension,

eikx↦e−ikx.e^{ikx} \mapsto e^{-ikx}.

A scattering state includes its incoming and outgoing boundary conditions. Complex conjugation reverses their roles as well as the current, so it generally produces a different scattering state rather than a real representative of the original one.

  • Saying Θ=K\Theta=K without specifying the representation.
  • Forgetting that Θ=K\Theta=K is still antiunitary, not linear.
  • Confusing spinless time reversal with parity. Time reversal leaves position fixed; parity reverses position.
  • Assuming Θ2=+I\Theta^2=+I implies no degeneracies. It only means there is no Kramers-enforced degeneracy.
  • Inferring time-reversal breaking solely from a nonzero vector potential, or ignoring a flux-dependent boundary condition when the local differential expression is real.
  • Concluding every eigenfunction must be real even inside a degenerate subspace or with scattering boundary conditions.
  1. Verify KPK−1=−PKPK^{-1}=-P for P=−iℏ d/dxP=-i\hbar\,d/dx.
Solution

Since K−1=KK^{-1}=K,

(KPK−1ψ)(x)=K[−iℏddxψ(x)∗].(KPK^{-1}\psi)(x) = K\left[ -i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}\psi(x)^* \right].

Complex conjugating the result gives

(KPK−1ψ)(x)=iℏddxψ(x)=−Pψ(x).(KPK^{-1}\psi)(x) = i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}\psi(x) = -P\psi(x).

Thus KPK−1=−PKPK^{-1}=-P.

  1. Show that a plane wave reverses momentum and current under spinless time reversal.
Solution

For

ψk(x)=eikx,\psi_k(x)=e^{ikx},

complex conjugation gives

Kψk(x)=e−ikx=ψ−k(x).K\psi_k(x)=e^{-ikx}=\psi_{-k}(x).

The momentum eigenvalue changes from ℏk\hbar k to −ℏk-\hbar k. The current

j=ℏmIm⁡(ψ∗∂xψ)j = \frac{\hbar}{m}\operatorname{Im}(\psi^*\partial_x\psi)

changes from ℏk/m\hbar k/m to −ℏk/m-\hbar k/m.

  1. Let
H=aI+bxσx+byσy+bzσzH=aI+b_x\sigma_x+b_y\sigma_y+b_z\sigma_z

be a Hermitian two-state Hamiltonian in a basis where spinless time reversal is KK. Which terms are allowed by KHK−1=HKHK^{-1}=H?

Solution

The matrices II, σx\sigma_x, and σz\sigma_z are real, while σy\sigma_y is imaginary. Therefore

KσxK−1=σx,KσzK−1=σz,KσyK−1=−σy.K\sigma_xK^{-1}=\sigma_x, \qquad K\sigma_zK^{-1}=\sigma_z, \qquad K\sigma_yK^{-1}=-\sigma_y.

The time-reversal-invariant Hamiltonian has

by=0,b_y=0,

while aa, bxb_x, and bzb_z are allowed. Equivalently, HH must be real symmetric in this basis.

  • L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
  • L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed., Pergamon Press, 1977.
  • A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Dover, 1999.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.