Skip to content

Time Reversal for Spin-1/2 Particles

For a spin-1/21/2 degree of freedom, time reversal is not just complex conjugation. It must also flip the spin vector. In the standard SzS_z basis, a convenient convention is

Θ=−iσyK,\Theta = -i\sigma_yK,

where KK complex-conjugates spinor components in that basis. The antiunitary operator Θ\Theta satisfies

ΘSiΘ−1=−Si,Si=ℏ2σi,\Theta S_i\Theta^{-1} = -S_i, \qquad S_i=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_i,

and

Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I

on a single spin-1/21/2 Hilbert space. This minus sign forces each pure spin state to be orthogonal to its time reverse. If the Hamiltonian also preserves time reversal, that partner has the same energy.

Use the ordered basis

∣↑⟩=(10),∣↓⟩=(01),\lvert\uparrow\rangle = \begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \lvert\downarrow\rangle = \begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix},

where these are eigenstates of SzS_z. In this basis,

σy=(0−ii0),−iσy=(0−110).\sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0&-i\\ i&0 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad -i\sigma_y = \begin{pmatrix} 0&-1\\ 1&0 \end{pmatrix}.

Thus Θ=−iσyK\Theta=-i\sigma_yK means: first complex-conjugate the components, then multiply by −iσy-i\sigma_y. The symbol KK is basis-dependent; the antiunitary operator Θ\Theta is the object with physical meaning.

Equivalently,

Θ=e−iπSy/ℏK\Theta = e^{-i\pi S_y/\hbar}K

in the same SzS_z basis. The unitary factor is a π\pi rotation about the yy axis in spin space. The complex conjugation supplies antiunitarity.

Applying Θ\Theta to the standard basis gives

Θ∣↑⟩=∣↓⟩,Θ∣↓⟩=−∣↑⟩.\Theta\lvert\uparrow\rangle = \lvert\downarrow\rangle, \qquad \Theta\lvert\downarrow\rangle = -\lvert\uparrow\rangle.

For a general spinor

∣ψ⟩=α∣↑⟩+β∣↓⟩,\lvert\psi\rangle = \alpha\lvert\uparrow\rangle + \beta\lvert\downarrow\rangle,

antilinearity gives

Θ∣ψ⟩=−β∗∣↑⟩+α∗∣↓⟩.\Theta\lvert\psi\rangle = -\beta^*\lvert\uparrow\rangle + \alpha^*\lvert\downarrow\rangle.

For example, (∣↑⟩+i∣↓⟩)/2(|\uparrow\rangle+i|\downarrow\rangle)/\sqrt2 has spin along +y+y. Its transformed spinor is (i∣↑⟩+∣↓⟩)/2(i|\uparrow\rangle+|\downarrow\rangle)/\sqrt2, which points along −y-y. Dropping conjugation would give the wrong direction.

Time reversal should reverse angular momentum. For spin-1/21/2, this means

ΘσΘ−1=−σ,\Theta\boldsymbol\sigma\Theta^{-1} = -\boldsymbol\sigma,

or componentwise,

ΘσxΘ−1=−σx,ΘσyΘ−1=−σy,ΘσzΘ−1=−σz.\Theta\sigma_x\Theta^{-1}=-\sigma_x, \qquad \Theta\sigma_y\Theta^{-1}=-\sigma_y, \qquad \Theta\sigma_z\Theta^{-1}=-\sigma_z.

The σy\sigma_y component is the one most likely to trip up a calculation, because KσyK−1=−σyK\sigma_yK^{-1}=-\sigma_y. Both the unitary factor and the complex conjugation must be included.

Consequently,

ΘSΘ−1=−S.\Theta\mathbf S\Theta^{-1} = -\mathbf S.

This is the spin analog of the orbital rule

ΘLΘ−1=−L,\Theta\mathbf L\Theta^{-1} = -\mathbf L,

discussed on the overview page for Time Reversal.

Let U=−iσyU=-i\sigma_y, so Θ=UK\Theta=UK. Since UU is real in the displayed basis,

Θ2=UKUK=UU∗=U2.\Theta^2 = UKUK = UU^* = U^2.

But

U2=(−iσy)2=−I.U^2 = (-i\sigma_y)^2 = -I.

Therefore

Θ2=−I.\Theta^2=-I.

This result does not depend on the arbitrary overall phase of Θ\Theta. If

Θ′=eiχΘ,\Theta' = e^{i\chi}\Theta,

then antiunitarity gives

(Θ′)2=eiχΘeiχΘ=eiχe−iχΘ2=Θ2.(\Theta')^2 = e^{i\chi}\Theta e^{i\chi}\Theta = e^{i\chi}e^{-i\chi}\Theta^2 = \Theta^2.

So the sign of Θ2\Theta^2 is not removable by a phase redefinition. It is a projective representation feature of half-integer spin.

Any Hermitian Hamiltonian on a single spin-1/21/2 space can be written

H=aI+b⋅σ,H = aI+\mathbf b\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma,

with real aa and real b\mathbf b. Under spin-1/21/2 time reversal,

ΘHΘ−1=aI−b⋅σ.\Theta H\Theta^{-1} = aI-\mathbf b\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma.

If no external time-reversal-odd parameter is being transformed along with the system, time-reversal invariance requires

b=0.\mathbf b=0.

This statement concerns a Hamiltonian on this two-dimensional spin space alone. With orbital or momentum degrees of freedom, a term such as b(k)⋅σ\mathbf b(\mathbf k)\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma can preserve time reversal if b(−k)=−b(k)\mathbf b(-\mathbf k)=-\mathbf b(\mathbf k). Time reversal then relates different momenta rather than forbidding every spin-dependent term. In contrast, a magnetic-field Hamiltonian

H(B)=−γS⋅BH(\mathbf B) = -\gamma\mathbf S\cdot\mathbf B

obeys

ΘH(B)Θ−1=H(−B).\Theta H(\mathbf B)\Theta^{-1} = H(-\mathbf B).

For nonzero magnetic coupling, a fixed background B≠0\mathbf B\ne0 therefore breaks ordinary time reversal. The field-reversed family remains covariant. This distinction is essential in Spin in Magnetic Fields.

Suppose a Hamiltonian is time-reversal invariant:

ΘHΘ−1=H.\Theta H\Theta^{-1}=H.

If

H∣ψ⟩=E∣ψ⟩,H\lvert\psi\rangle = E\lvert\psi\rangle,

then Θ∣ψ⟩\Theta\lvert\psi\rangle is also an energy eigenstate with the same energy. The antiunitary sign Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I also forces orthogonality:

⟨ψ∣Θψ⟩=0.\langle\psi|\Theta\psi\rangle=0.

This is the algebraic core of Kramers Degeneracy. The theorem has its own hypotheses and applications, but the spin-1/21/2 calculation here explains why the degeneracy is tied to half-integer spin and antiunitary time reversal rather than to ordinary unitary symmetry alone.

  • Writing Θ=−iσy\Theta=-i\sigma_y and forgetting the complex conjugation operator KK.
  • Treating KK as basis-independent. It is complex conjugation in a specified basis.
  • Assuming Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I can be changed to +I+I by multiplying Θ\Theta by a phase.
  • Forgetting that antiunitarity conjugates scalar coefficients.
  • Testing time reversal of a magnetic-field Hamiltonian without saying whether the external field is transformed.
  • Assuming every spin system has Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I. Two spin-1/21/2 particles have a product time-reversal operator with square +I+I.
  1. Use Θ=−iσyK\Theta=-i\sigma_yK to compute Θ∣↑⟩\Theta\lvert\uparrow\rangle and Θ∣↓⟩\Theta\lvert\downarrow\rangle.
Solution

In the SzS_z basis, both basis spinors are real, so KK leaves their components unchanged. Then

Θ∣↑⟩=(0−110)(10)=(01)=∣↓⟩.\Theta\lvert\uparrow\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} 0&-1\\ 1&0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1\\0\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix} = \lvert\downarrow\rangle.

Similarly,

Θ∣↓⟩=(0−110)(01)=(−10)=−∣↑⟩.\Theta\lvert\downarrow\rangle = \begin{pmatrix} 0&-1\\ 1&0 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}0\\1\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}-1\\0\end{pmatrix} = -\lvert\uparrow\rangle.
  1. Show that Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I by applying Θ\Theta twice to an arbitrary spinor.
Solution

Let

∣ψ⟩=α∣↑⟩+β∣↓⟩.\lvert\psi\rangle = \alpha\lvert\uparrow\rangle + \beta\lvert\downarrow\rangle.

The first application gives

Θ∣ψ⟩=−β∗∣↑⟩+α∗∣↓⟩.\Theta\lvert\psi\rangle = -\beta^*\lvert\uparrow\rangle + \alpha^*\lvert\downarrow\rangle.

Apply Θ\Theta again, remembering antilinearity:

Θ2∣ψ⟩=−(α∗)∗∣↑⟩+(−β∗)∗∣↓⟩=−α∣↑⟩−β∣↓⟩.\Theta^2\lvert\psi\rangle = -(\alpha^*)^*\lvert\uparrow\rangle + (-\beta^*)^*\lvert\downarrow\rangle = -\alpha\lvert\uparrow\rangle -\beta\lvert\downarrow\rangle.

Therefore

Θ2∣ψ⟩=−∣ψ⟩.\Theta^2\lvert\psi\rangle = -\lvert\psi\rangle.
  1. For H=aI+b⋅σH=aI+\mathbf b\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma, impose ΘHΘ−1=H\Theta H\Theta^{-1}=H.
Solution

Since ΘIΘ−1=I\Theta I\Theta^{-1}=I and ΘσiΘ−1=−σi\Theta\sigma_i\Theta^{-1}=-\sigma_i,

ΘHΘ−1=aI−b⋅σ.\Theta H\Theta^{-1} = aI-\mathbf b\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma.

Equating this with

H=aI+b⋅σH = aI+\mathbf b\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma

requires

b=0.\mathbf b=0.

Thus a nonzero fixed splitting in this two-dimensional space breaks time reversal. Transforming an external parameter compares a different Hamiltonian and does not establish invariance at the original parameter value.

  1. Prove the orthogonality statement ⟨ψ∣Θψ⟩=0\langle\psi|\Theta\psi\rangle=0 when Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I.
Solution

Let

c=⟨ψ∣Θψ⟩.c = \langle\psi|\Theta\psi\rangle.

Antiunitarity gives

⟨Θψ∣Θ2ψ⟩=⟨ψ∣Θψ⟩∗=c∗.\langle\Theta\psi|\Theta^2\psi\rangle = \langle\psi|\Theta\psi\rangle^* = c^*.

But Θ2=−I\Theta^2=-I, so the left side is

⟨Θψ∣−ψ⟩=−⟨Θψ∣ψ⟩=−c∗.\langle\Theta\psi|-\psi\rangle = -\langle\Theta\psi|\psi\rangle = -c^*.

Hence c∗=−c∗c^*=-c^*, so c=0c=0.

  • L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
  • A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Dover, 1999.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • M. Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics, Dover, 2003.
  • E. P. Wigner, Group Theory and Its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra, Academic Press, 1959.