Skip to content

Superposition is a linear operation on state representatives, followed by passage to the nonzero result’s ray. In infinite dimensions, an infinite superposition is also a convergence claim. Square-summable coefficients suffice for an orthonormal expansion to define a state, but they need not put that state in the domain of its Hamiltonian. This page isolates those mathematical qualifications; the physical meaning of relative phase and interference is developed in Superposition and Relative Phase.

Required background. Superposition and Relative Phase separates coherent sums from mixtures. Hilbert Space as State Space supplies norm convergence and orthonormal expansions.

Finite sums require chosen representatives

Section titled “Finite sums require chosen representatives”

For vectors ψ,ϕ∈H\psi,\phi\in\mathcal H, the vector aψ+bϕa\psi+b\phi exists for every a,b∈Ca,b\in\mathbb C. It defines a state only when it is nonzero. Its squared norm is

∥aψ+bϕ∥2=∣a∣2∥ψ∥2+∣b∣2∥ϕ∥2+2Re⁡(a‾b⟨ψ,ϕ⟩).\|a\psi+b\phi\|^2 =|a|^2\|\psi\|^2+|b|^2\|\phi\|^2 +2\operatorname{Re}\bigl(\overline a b\langle\psi,\phi\rangle\bigr).

The coefficient squares are therefore not automatically probabilities of exclusive alternatives. That interpretation requires an orthonormal decomposition or an explicitly specified measurement.

The input rays alone do not specify the output ray. Replacing ϕ\phi by eiθϕe^{i\theta}\phi while keeping a,ba,b fixed generally changes the sum. To express the same vector in the rephased representatives, one must also replace bb by e−iθbe^{-i\theta}b. This is the coordinate consistency condition behind a coherent preparation, not an exception to global-phase invariance.

Even the existence of a mathematical sum does not establish that a particular restricted observable algebra can detect its coherence. That separate issue is treated in Direct Sums and Superselection.

Let {en}n≥1\{e_n\}_{n\geq1} be an orthonormal sequence, and let

sN=∑n=1Ncnen.s_N=\sum_{n=1}^{N}c_ne_n.

For M>NM>N, orthogonality gives

∥sM−sN∥2=∑n=N+1M∣cn∣2.\|s_M-s_N\|^2=\sum_{n=N+1}^{M}|c_n|^2.

Hence sNs_N converges in Hilbert norm exactly when (cn)∈ℓ2(c_n)\in\ell^2. Completeness supplies the limit, and orthogonality gives its norm. If the sequence is an orthonormal basis, every state admits such an expansion. If it is not complete, only the closed span is represented.

These series converge unconditionally: every rearrangement has the same norm limit, because the squared tail can be made arbitrarily small outside a sufficiently large finite set. This statement depends on orthogonality. For a general sequence of normalized, nonorthogonal vectors, square-summable coefficients alone need not make the vector series converge. Taking every vector equal to a fixed unit vector and cn=1/nc_n=1/n gives an immediate counterexample.

A formal continuous-basis integral is different again. Position and momentum kets are generally generalized vectors, not members of an uncountable orthonormal basis in H\mathcal H. The Schrödinger Representation explains the Hilbert-space operators underlying that notation.

An admissible state outside the energy domain

Section titled “An admissible state outside the energy domain”

On ℓ2(N)\ell^2(\mathbb N) define the self-adjoint diagonal Hamiltonian

Hen=E0n en,D(H)={∑ncnen:∑nn2∣cn∣2<∞},He_n=E_0n\,e_n, \qquad D(H)=\left\{\sum_n c_ne_n:\sum_n n^2|c_n|^2<\infty\right\},

with fixed energy scale E0>0E_0>0. Every finite sum belongs to D(H)D(H). Nevertheless,

ψ=C∑n≥11nen,C=6π,\psi=C\sum_{n\geq1}\frac1n e_n, \qquad C=\frac{\sqrt6}{\pi},

is normalized and lies outside D(H)D(H). Its finite truncations converge in norm, while the norms of their Hamiltonian images diverge. Even the mean energy diverges, since the corresponding sum is E0C2∑n1/nE_0C^2\sum_n1/n.

There is no inconsistency: a Hilbert-space state need not have every energy moment. The unitary e−itH/ℏe^{-itH/\hbar} acts on ψ\psi for every tt, but its orbit is not differentiable in Hilbert norm at zero. Treating the formal termwise derivative as an ℓ2\ell^2 vector would be the invalid step.

A finite mean energy does not itself restore membership in D(H)D(H). The moment example in Measure Theory Minimum constructs a state in the form domain D(H1/2)D(H^{1/2}) but outside D(H)D(H), separating first-moment control from the stronger second-moment condition.

For a closed operator AA, the graph norm is

∥ψ∥A2=∥ψ∥2+∥Aψ∥2,ψ∈D(A).\|\psi\|_A^2=\|\psi\|^2+\|A\psi\|^2, \qquad \psi\in D(A).

When units matter, scale the second term by an appropriate fixed quantity. Convergence in this norm means convergence both of the state and of its operator image. Closedness then ensures that the limit remains in D(A)D(A) and that the image limit is AψA\psi.

For the diagonal Hamiltonian, coefficients proportional to n−2n^{-2} produce graph-norm-convergent truncations: the Hamiltonian-image tail is controlled by ∑n>Nn−2\sum_{n>N}n^{-2}. This gives a practical lesson for expansions and numerical approximations. State convergence, energy-form convergence, and convergence of the Hamiltonian action are distinct targets. The observable being approximated determines which one is needed.

Exercise: a bounded test and an unbounded test

Section titled “Exercise: a bounded test and an unbounded test”

For the normalized cn=C/nc_n=C/n state above, let PNP_N project onto the first NN basis vectors. Explain why every bounded observable has a convergent expectation along normalized PNψP_N\psi, even though the energy expectation diverges.

Solution

The normalized projections converge in Hilbert norm to ψ\psi. For any bounded BB, the difference of expectations is at most 2∥B∥2\|B\| times the vector-norm error, so it tends to zero. For energy, the normalized truncated expectation is

E0∑n=1Nn−1∑n=1Nn−2,E_0\frac{\sum_{n=1}^{N}n^{-1}}{\sum_{n=1}^{N}n^{-2}},

which diverges logarithmically. The denominator approaches a finite nonzero limit. There is no bounded operator norm ∥H∥\|H\| with which to apply the preceding estimate.