Strong Continuity
Strong continuity of a quantum channel family means continuity of each trace-class orbit in trace norm. It does not mean that one small time step is uniformly small for every state. An unbounded Hamiltonian already separates these notions, without dissipation or approximation. Naming both the space and the topology is therefore part of stating a dynamical theorem.
Required background. Trace Class Operators supplies the state Banach space. Helpful background. Quantum Dynamical Semigroups introduces the composition law.
Strong continuity concerns one trace-class orbit at a time
Section titled “Strong continuity concerns one trace-class orbit at a time”For bounded linear maps on , strong continuity at zero means
Here “strong” is the strong operator topology for superoperators acting on the Banach space . It differs from the strong operator topology of observables acting on Hilbert vectors.
For a channel semigroup, contraction and the composition law propagate continuity from zero to every time. For ,
The analogous estimate with handles left continuity at . Such a semigroup is called a semigroup.
Uniform, or operator-norm, continuity is the stronger requirement
Every norm-continuous semigroup has a bounded everywhere-defined generator, and conversely a bounded generator gives a norm-continuous exponential. A semigroup may have an unbounded generator defined only on a dense domain. In finite dimensions, these distinctions disappear because convergence on a finite basis controls the operator norm.
Hilbert-space continuity gives trace-norm continuity for unitary dynamics
Section titled “Hilbert-space continuity gives trace-norm continuity for unitary dynamics”Let be self-adjoint, possibly unbounded, and set with . The spectral theorem gives strong continuity of on . Define .
For a rank-one operator ,
Thus the trace-norm orbit is continuous on finite-rank operators. Given arbitrary , choose finite-rank with . Unitary invariance of trace norm yields
Taking and then proves the property. No finite energy or membership in was required of the density operator. Those stronger conditions become relevant to differentiability, not to the existence and continuity of the orbit.
Worked example: arbitrarily fast phases prevent uniform continuity
Section titled “Worked example: arbitrarily fast phases prevent uniform continuity”Use an orthonormal basis , , and let
This defines a self-adjoint operator on the domain whose excited coefficients satisfy . For
is orthogonal to the input. Hence, with ,
Although , uniform continuity fails maximally along this sequence. Strong continuity still holds for each fixed : the increasingly rapid phase occurs in a block that changes with .
There is also a fixed bounded observable for which the dual orbit is not norm continuous. Let interchange and in every block. Then , while the th block gives . Thus continuity on trace-class states does not imply norm continuity of every orbit on .
The normal dual evolves ultraweakly
Section titled “The normal dual evolves ultraweakly”For , trace-class strong continuity implies
This is point-ultraweak continuity of . It controls every bounded-observable expectation in every normal initial state. It is enough for the normal dual description even when observable-norm continuity fails.
In the unitary example, is also strongly continuous on Hilbert vectors, because both and are strongly continuous and uniformly bounded. That additional statement still does not imply observable-norm continuity. The phrases “strongly continuous” and “continuous in norm” must therefore be attached to the specific action under discussion.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”A dense family of tests. Suppose channel maps satisfy in trace norm for every finite-rank . Prove strong continuity at zero on the whole trace class.
Solution
For fixed , approximate it by finite-rank . Channel contraction gives . The order of choices matters: choose for the given input and tolerance, then choose the time.
Unbounded generator. In the block example compute the generator on .
Solution
, so . Since but , the generator is unbounded. Each matrix unit is nevertheless a perfectly differentiable orbit, illustrating why a dense differentiability domain can coexist with an unbounded derivative.
References
Section titled “References”- Engel, Klaus-Jochen, and Rainer Nagel. One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 194, Springer, 2000. doi:10.1007/b97696. Strong versus uniform continuity and the bounded-generator theorem.
- Hall, Brian C. Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 267, Springer, 2013. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7116-5. Self-adjoint generators and unitary evolution.