Skip to content

The Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction turns a state on a C*-algebra into a vector expectation in a cyclic Hilbert-space representation. It constructs the Hilbert space from the state’s correlations and determines that cyclic realization uniquely up to unitary equivalence. Becoming a vector state in this representation does not imply that the original algebraic state is pure.

Required background. The Algebraic State Space defines states of a unital C*-algebra. Positive State Functionals proves the positive-functional Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. Representations defines cyclicity and unitary equivalence.

The state defines a semidefinite inner product

Section titled “The state defines a semidefinite inner product”

Let A\mathcal A be a unital C*-algebra and ω\omega a state. Define

⟨a,b⟩ω=ω(a∗b),Nω={a:ω(a∗a)=0}.\langle a,b\rangle_\omega=\omega(a^*b),\qquad \mathcal N_\omega=\{a:\omega(a^*a)=0\}.

The form is conjugate-linear in its first argument, linear in its second, and positive semidefinite. Cauchy–Schwarz implies that every n∈Nωn\in\mathcal N_\omega is orthogonal to every algebra element. In particular, the null set is a linear subspace, and the form descends to a positive-definite inner product on the quotient vector space A/Nω\mathcal A/\mathcal N_\omega.

The quotient removes distinctions the state cannot detect through this quadratic form. It is not generally a quotient algebra. That distinction is essential because Nω\mathcal N_\omega is a left ideal, not necessarily a two-sided ideal.

The C*-order estimate makes left multiplication well defined

Section titled “The C*-order estimate makes left multiplication well defined”

For c,a∈Ac,a\in\mathcal A, the C*-order inequality c∗c≤∥c∥21c^*c\leq\|c\|^2 1 gives

0≤a∗c∗ca≤∥c∥2a∗a.0\leq a^*c^*ca\leq\|c\|^2a^*a.

Applying ω\omega yields

∥[ca]∥ω2≤∥c∥2∥[a]∥ω2.\|[ca]\|_\omega^2 \leq\|c\|^2\|[a]\|_\omega^2.

If aa is null, then so is caca. Thus Nω\mathcal N_\omega is a left ideal, and

πω(c)[a]=[ca]\pi_\omega(c)[a]=[ca]

does not depend on the representative of the class. The same estimate proves boundedness, ∥πω(c)∥≤∥c∥\|\pi_\omega(c)\|\leq\|c\|. Therefore each πω(c)\pi_\omega(c) extends uniquely to the Hilbert completion Hω\mathcal H_\omega of A/Nω\mathcal A/\mathcal N_\omega.

This is the analytic step missing from a merely formal quotient construction. Positivity alone on a general star algebra need not give bounded representing operators; the C*-norm and order estimate are doing substantive work.

Products are preserved by associativity. Moreover,

⟨[a],πω(c)[b]⟩=ω(a∗cb)=⟨πω(c∗)[a],[b]⟩,\langle[a],\pi_\omega(c)[b]\rangle =\omega(a^*cb) =\langle\pi_\omega(c^*)[a],[b]\rangle,

so πω(c)∗=πω(c∗)\pi_\omega(c)^*=\pi_\omega(c^*). Hence πω\pi_\omega is a unital representation.

The distinguished vector recovers all expectations

Section titled “The distinguished vector recovers all expectations”

Set Ωω=[1]\Omega_\omega=[1]. It has norm one, and

πω(a)Ωω=[a],ω(a)=⟨Ωω,πω(a)Ωω⟩.\pi_\omega(a)\Omega_\omega=[a],\qquad \omega(a)= \langle\Omega_\omega,\pi_\omega(a)\Omega_\omega\rangle.

The classes [a][a] are dense by construction, so Ωω\Omega_\omega is cyclic. This proves existence of the GNS triple (Hω,πω,Ωω)(\mathcal H_\omega,\pi_\omega,\Omega_\omega).

Faithfulness of the state, meaning ω(a∗a)=0\omega(a^*a)=0 only for a=0a=0, implies faithfulness of this representation. The converse need not hold: a vector state on MnM_n is not faithful for n>1n>1, while its GNS representation is the faithful defining representation.

Cyclic uniqueness identifies the correct notion of equivalence

Section titled “Cyclic uniqueness identifies the correct notion of equivalence”

Suppose another triple (K,ρ,Ω)(\mathcal K,\rho,\Omega) realizes the same state and Ω\Omega is cyclic. Define initially

U[a]=ρ(a)Ω.U[a]=\rho(a)\Omega.

Its inner products agree with those on the quotient:

⟨ρ(a)Ω,ρ(b)Ω⟩=ω(a∗b).\langle\rho(a)\Omega,\rho(b)\Omega\rangle =\omega(a^*b).

Thus UU is well defined and isometric. Cyclicity makes its range dense, so its continuous extension is unitary. It sends Ωω\Omega_\omega to Ω\Omega and satisfies Uπω(c)=ρ(c)UU\pi_\omega(c)=\rho(c)U. Uniqueness follows because its values on the dense cyclic set are fixed.

The distinguished vector matters. Equivalent representations without a specified vector can support many different states.

A mixed matrix state produces a larger cyclic space

Section titled “A mixed matrix state produces a larger cyclic space”

Take A=Mn(C)\mathcal A=M_n(\mathbb C) and ω(a)=Tr⁡(ρa)\omega(a)=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho a), with ρ\rho a density matrix of rank rr. Map

[a]⟼aρ1/2.[a]\longmapsto a\rho^{1/2}.

The Hilbert–Schmidt inner product gives exactly Tr⁡(ρa∗b)\operatorname{Tr}(\rho a^*b), so this realizes the GNS space as matrices vanishing on the kernel of ρ\rho, equivalently maps from its rr-dimensional support to Cn\mathbb C^n. Its dimension is nrnr.

The algebra acts by left multiplication; the cyclic vector is ρ1/2\rho^{1/2}. For r>1r>1, right multiplication on the support supplies a nontrivial commutant, so the representation is reducible. For r=1r=1, it is the defining irreducible representation.

Thus a mixed state becomes a cyclic vector in a representation with multiplicity. The pure-state theorem makes this relationship general.

Exercise: the null ideal need not be two-sided

Section titled “Exercise: the null ideal need not be two-sided”

For the vector state ω(a)=⟨e1,ae1⟩\omega(a)=\langle e_1,ae_1\rangle on M2M_2, identify Nω\mathcal N_\omega and find a∈Nωa\in\mathcal N_\omega, b∈M2b\in M_2 with ab∉Nωab\notin\mathcal N_\omega.

Solution

The null ideal consists of matrices with first column zero because ω(a∗a)=∥ae1∥2\omega(a^*a)=\|ae_1\|^2. Take a=∣e1⟩⟨e2∣a=|e_1\rangle\langle e_2| and b=∣e2⟩⟨e1∣b=|e_2\rangle\langle e_1|. Then ab=∣e1⟩⟨e1∣ab=|e_1\rangle\langle e_1| is not null. This is why the quotient is used as a vector space carrying left multiplication, rather than as a quotient algebra.

  • Bratteli, Ola, and Derek W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1, 2nd ed., Springer, 1987, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02520-8, Chapter 2 — GNS existence, uniqueness, and representation properties.
  • Naaijkens, Pieter, Quantum Spin Systems on Infinite Lattices, Lecture Notes in Physics 933, Springer, 2017, arXiv:1311.2717 — constructive state representations and finite-dimensional examples.