Occupation-Number Basis
The occupation-number basis labels a many-particle state by how many particles occupy each one-particle mode. Instead of asking which formal particle slot contains which state, it asks:
A basis vector is written schematically as
where is the occupation number of mode . This is the natural notation for identical particles because identical particles do not carry observable individual labels.
Helpful background. Indistinguishability explains particle slots, and Pauli Exclusion explains the fermionic restriction.
Single-Particle Modes
Section titled “Single-Particle Modes”Start with a one-particle Hilbert space and choose an orthonormal basis of one-particle modes:
A mode specifies a complete one-particle state, including any active spin or internal label. A spatial orbital alone counts as one mode only when internal states are absent or fixed. Examples include:
- a spatial orbital in an atom;
- a spin-orbital in quantum chemistry;
- a momentum and spin state in a gas;
- a harmonic-oscillator mode;
- an optical mode with a specified frequency, polarization, and spatial profile;
- a lattice-site orbital in a tight-binding model.
The occupation-number basis depends on this chosen mode basis. Changing modes changes the meaning of the occupation labels, just as changing a one-particle basis changes the components of a vector.
Occupation Numbers
Section titled “Occupation Numbers”The occupation number records how many particles occupy mode . The total particle number is
For a fixed- problem, only occupation strings with the same total are included. For example,
has three particles in total: two in mode , none in mode , and one in mode .
Occupation notation does not say “particle 1 is in mode 1.” It says “mode 1 has occupation 2.” That is exactly the shift needed for identical particles.
Bosonic Occupation Numbers
Section titled “Bosonic Occupation Numbers”For bosons, each mode may have any nonnegative integer occupation:
Thus a bosonic basis vector may look like
This means that two bosons occupy mode , one boson occupies mode , and the displayed other modes are empty.
For two bosons in two distinct orthonormal modes and , the occupation vector
corresponds in slot language to the symmetric state
For two bosons in the same mode,
corresponds to the symmetric two-particle state
The mode occupation already knows the particles are identical; it does not need to list two separate particle names.
Fermionic Occupation Numbers
Section titled “Fermionic Occupation Numbers”For fermions, Pauli exclusion restricts each mode to occupation zero or one:
A fermionic basis vector such as
means that modes , , and are occupied, while mode is empty.
For two fermions in two distinct orthonormal modes and , the occupation vector
corresponds to the antisymmetric state
The forbidden two-fermion occupation
does not exist. In fermionic notation, mode can have occupation or , not .
For fermions, a fixed ordering of modes is part of the convention. Signs in later creation-operator formulas depend on that ordering. The occupation string itself records which modes are filled; the operator algebra records the signs produced by reordering fermionic operations.
Superpositions at fixed particle number
Section titled “Superpositions at fixed particle number”The notation also handles superpositions. For one particle in two modes,
is delocalized across two modes. It has total number one, although neither mode has a definite occupation. A measurement finds the particle in either mode with probability .
The normalized basis vectors are developed in Number States.
Compact labels and large state spaces
Section titled “Compact labels and large state spaces”Slot wavefunctions become unwieldy as particle number grows. A three-boson state with one particle in each of three modes is a sum over slot permutations. An -fermion Slater determinant contains a signed sum over permutations.
Occupation notation compresses this information:
records the same mode content without writing every permutation. The symmetry or antisymmetry is carried by the bosonic or fermionic state space and, later, by the creation and annihilation operator algebra.
This compresses the exchange permutations of one basis vector. A general state still needs one amplitude per allowed occupation pattern. For complete modes at fixed , there are bosonic patterns or fermionic patterns. At fixed filling these counts grow exponentially with system size; occupation notation alone does not solve the Hilbert-space scaling problem.
Basis Dependence
Section titled “Basis Dependence”Occupation is always occupation of a chosen set of modes. If a one-particle mode basis is changed, a state with definite occupation in the old basis may become a superposition of occupation states in the new basis.
For example, a one-particle state occupying mode can be rewritten in a new basis
Then
The phrase “the occupation of mode ” is meaningful only after mode has been specified.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- How many particles are represented by the bosonic occupation vector ?
Solution
The total particle number is the sum of the occupations:
- List all allowed two-particle fermionic occupation vectors for three modes.
Solution
Each mode has occupation or , and the total occupation must be . The allowed vectors are
The vector is not allowed for fermions.
- Why is basis-dependent notation?
Solution
It says that the chosen mode is occupied and the chosen mode is empty. If one changes to a different one-particle mode basis, the same physical one-particle state may become a superposition of occupation states in the new basis. Occupation numbers are therefore meaningful only relative to a specified mode basis.
References
Section titled “References”- A. Altland and B. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
- P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 1958.
- A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, McGraw-Hill, 1971.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.