Skip to content

Time-Independent Hamiltonians

A Hamiltonian is time independent when it has no explicit dependence on the time parameter. In that case the time-evolution operator is the ordinary exponential

U(t,t0)=e−iH(t−t0)/ℏ.U(t,t_0)=e^{-iH(t-t_0)/\hbar}.

This is the simplest and most important exact solution of closed-system quantum dynamics.

The formula applies when the same self-adjoint Hamiltonian HH, with a fixed domain, generates evolution throughout the interval from t0t_0 to tt. It does not require HH to be diagonal in the basis being used, but it does require HH not to change with time.

For unbounded Hamiltonians, the exponential is defined through spectral theory. In finite dimensions, it is the usual matrix exponential.

If HH has a discrete spectral decomposition

H=∑nEnPn,H=\sum_n E_n P_n,

then

U(t,t0)=∑ne−iEn(t−t0)/ℏPn.U(t,t_0) =\sum_n e^{-iE_n(t-t_0)/\hbar}P_n.

For nondegenerate eigenstates, Pn=∣En⟩⟨En∣P_n=\lvert E_n\rangle\langle E_n\rvert, so

U(t,t0)=∑ne−iEn(t−t0)/ℏ∣En⟩⟨En∣.U(t,t_0) =\sum_n e^{-iE_n(t-t_0)/\hbar} \lvert E_n\rangle\langle E_n\rvert.

This makes energy-basis evolution especially transparent: each energy component acquires a phase. Stationary states and phases explains why a superposition of different energies can still have time-dependent probabilities.

If an energy level is degenerate, every state inside that eigenspace gets the same phase under HH alone. Under HH alone the ray of every vector in that eigenspace is fixed. A basis change does not create dynamics. An added perturbation can split or mix the subspace, and a measurement can change the state through a separate state-update operation.

For continuous spectra, sums are replaced by spectral integrals. The free particle is the standard example: momentum components evolve by phases determined by E=p2/(2m)E=p^2/(2m).

The formal lesson is unchanged. Diagonalize the Hamiltonian, attach phases to spectral components, then transform back if needed.

In a finite-dimensional basis, HH is a Hermitian matrix. If it is diagonalized as

H=VDV†,H=V D V^\dagger,

then

e−iHτ/ℏ=Ve−iDτ/ℏV†,τ=t−t0.e^{-iH\tau/\hbar} = V e^{-iD\tau/\hbar}V^\dagger, \qquad \tau=t-t_0.

This is often the stable way to compute exact finite-dimensional time evolution.

For a diagonal two-level Hamiltonian

H=ℏω2σz,H=\frac{\hbar\omega}{2}\sigma_z,

the evolution is

U(t,0)=(e−iωt/200eiωt/2).U(t,0) = \begin{pmatrix} e^{-i\omega t/2} & 0\\ 0 & e^{i\omega t/2} \end{pmatrix}.

For the harmonic oscillator,

H=ℏω(a†a+12),H=\hbar\omega\left(a^\dagger a+\frac12\right),

number states evolve as

∣n;t⟩=e−iω(n+1/2)t∣n⟩.\lvert n;t\rangle =e^{-i\omega(n+1/2)t}\lvert n\rangle.
  • Substituting an instantaneous H(t)H(t) into this formula. Even if all H(t)H(t) commute, the exponent uses ∫t0tH(s) ds\int_{t_0}^tH(s)\,ds, not generally H(t)(t−t0)H(t)(t-t_0).
  • Thinking a time-independent Hamiltonian means all observables are time independent.
  • Forgetting relative phases between different energy eigenstates.
  • Treating degeneracy as if it automatically fixes a preferred basis inside the degenerate subspace.
  • Ignoring domain issues for unbounded Hamiltonians in rigorous arguments.
  • M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis, revised and enlarged ed., Academic Press, 1980.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  1. Suppose H=∑nEnPnH=\sum_n E_nP_n. Show that U(t,t0)=∑ne−iEn(t−t0)/ℏPnU(t,t_0)=\sum_n e^{-iE_n(t-t_0)/\hbar}P_n satisfies the operator Schrödinger equation.
Solution

Differentiate the spectral expression:

iℏ∂U∂t=∑nEne−iEn(t−t0)/ℏPn.i\hbar\frac{\partial U}{\partial t} = \sum_n E_n e^{-iE_n(t-t_0)/\hbar}P_n.

Since HPn=EnPnHP_n=E_nP_n, the right-hand side is HU(t,t0)HU(t,t_0).