A picture transformation is a time-dependent unitary change of variables that moves time dependence between states, observables, and Hamiltonians without changing physical predictions.
This page uses the convention
∣ψP(t)⟩=R†(t)∣ψS(t)⟩,AP(t)=R†(t)AS(t)R(t),
where R(t) is unitary. With this convention, the transformed Hamiltonian is
HP(t)=R†(t)HS(t)R(t)−iℏR†(t)R˙(t).
The second term is the common source of sign mistakes. It appears whenever the transformation itself depends on time.
The differential calculations below apply directly to differentiable unitary matrices. For unbounded operators, use a common invariant domain preserved by the evolution and R(t), with the displayed strong derivatives defined there; see domains in Hamiltonian evolution.
Let the Schrödinger-picture state obey
iℏdtd∣ψS(t)⟩=HS(t)∣ψS(t)⟩.
Choose a unitary R(t) and define the transformed state by
∣ψP(t)⟩=R†(t)∣ψS(t)⟩.
The transformed observable is chosen so that expectation values are unchanged:
AP(t)=R†(t)AS(t)R(t).
Then
⟨ψP(t)∣AP(t)∣ψP(t)⟩=⟨ψS(t)∣(RR†)AS(t)(RR†)∣ψS(t)⟩=⟨ψS(t)∣AS(t)∣ψS(t)⟩.
The transformed propagator also has two frame factors:
UP(t,t0)=R†(t)U(t,t0)R(t0).
The initial factor cannot be dropped unless R(t0)=I; it ensures UP(t0,t0)=I.
Differentiate the transformed state:
dtd∣ψP⟩=R˙†∣ψS⟩+R†dtd∣ψS⟩.
Substitute ∣ψS⟩=R∣ψP⟩ and the Schrödinger equation:
iℏdtd∣ψP⟩=(iℏR˙†R+R†HSR)∣ψP⟩.
Unitarity gives
R˙†R=−R†R˙,
so
HP=R†HSR−iℏR†R˙.
The energy observable is EP=R†HSR. Define the frame generator K=iℏR†R˙, so that HP=EP−K. The state generator HP and the physical energy observable EP are different objects in a moving frame.
Set
R(t)=U(t,t0),
where U(t,t0) is the full time-evolution operator. Then
∣ψH⟩=U†(t,t0)∣ψS(t)⟩=∣ψS(t0)⟩,
and
AH(t)=U†(t,t0)AS(t)U(t,t0).
The transformed Hamiltonian vanishes for the state equation:
HHstate=U†HU−iℏU†U˙=0,
because iℏU˙=HU. The energy observable HH=U†HU remains nonzero in general. This is why a fixed Heisenberg state can have nonzero energy and time-dependent predictions.
For a split
HS(t)=H0+V(t),
take H0 time independent and choose
R(t)=U0(t,t0)=e−iH0(t−t0)/ℏ.
Then
∣ψI(t)⟩=U0†(t,t0)∣ψS(t)⟩,AI(t)=U0†(t,t0)ASU0(t,t0).
The transformed Hamiltonian is
HI(t)=U0†(H0+V)U0−iℏU0†U˙0=U0†(t,t0)V(t)U0(t,t0)=VI(t).
The H0 part cancels against the extra generator term. This cancellation is the algebraic heart of the interaction picture.
A rotating frame is another time-dependent picture. Let
R(t)=e−iωtG/ℏ,
where G generates the rotation. Since
R˙(t)=−ℏiωGR(t),
the extra term is
−iℏR†R˙=−ωG.
If HS commutes with G, then
HP=HS−ωG.
For a spin with HS=ω0Sz and G=Sz, a frame rotating about z has
HP=(ω0−ω)Sz.
This subtraction exposes detunings in driven rotating frames. The transformation itself is exact.
The transformed operator is
AP(t)=R†(t)AS(t)R(t).
Differentiating gives both explicit time dependence and picture-induced time dependence:
dtdAP=R†∂t∂ASR+R˙†ASR+R†ASR˙.
With the frame generator K=iℏR†R˙, this is
dtdAP=ℏi[K,AP]+R†∂t∂ASR.
The operator’s picture-induced derivative involves K, not the state generator HP. State evolution and operator evolution combine in an expectation value: HP+K=EP recovers the original physical dynamics. For R=U, K=HH, giving the Heisenberg equation.
Some books define the transformed state as R(t)∣ψS(t)⟩ instead of R†(t)∣ψS(t)⟩. That convention is equally valid, but the transformed operator and Hamiltonian formulas change:
∣ψP⟩=R∣ψS⟩⟹HP=RHSR†+iℏR˙R†.
Before comparing formulas across sources, identify which side carries the dagger.
- Transforming states but leaving observables in the old picture.
- Forgetting the extra term −iℏR†R˙ for time-dependent R(t).
- Using the right formula with the opposite convention for R(t).
- Treating the interaction picture as approximate before any expansion is truncated.
- Confusing explicit time dependence in AS(t) with time dependence induced by R(t).
- Calling a nonunitary similarity transformation a change of picture without checking the inner product and expectation values.
- Dropping picture labels in a calculation where several transformed objects appear.
- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 1958.
- H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2002.
- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
- Derive the transformed Hamiltonian for the convention ∣ψP⟩=R†∣ψS⟩.
Solution
Differentiate:
dtd∣ψP⟩=R˙†∣ψS⟩+R†dtd∣ψS⟩.
Use ∣ψS⟩=R∣ψP⟩ and
iℏdtd∣ψS⟩=HS∣ψS⟩.
Then
iℏdtd∣ψP⟩=(iℏR˙†R+R†HSR)∣ψP⟩.
Since R˙†R=−R†R˙,
HP=R†HSR−iℏR†R˙.
- Show that choosing R(t)=U(t,t0) makes the Heisenberg state time independent.
Solution
With R=U,
∣ψP(t)⟩=U†(t,t0)∣ψS(t)⟩.
But ∣ψS(t)⟩=U(t,t0)∣ψS(t0)⟩, so
∣ψP(t)⟩=U†(t,t0)U(t,t0)∣ψS(t0)⟩=∣ψS(t0)⟩.
This fixed state is the Heisenberg state.
- Let R(t)=e−iωtG/ℏ. Compute the extra term in the transformed Hamiltonian.
Solution
Differentiate:
R˙(t)=−ℏiωGR(t).
Then
R†R˙=−ℏiωG,
assuming G commutes with its own exponential. Therefore
−iℏR†R˙=−ωG.
- Under a unitary picture transformation, why must observables transform as AP=R†ASR if states transform as ∣ψP⟩=R†∣ψS⟩?
Solution
The expectation value should be invariant:
⟨ψP∣AP∣ψP⟩=⟨ψS∣AS∣ψS⟩.
Since ∣ψP⟩=R†∣ψS⟩, one has ⟨ψP∣=⟨ψS∣R. Choosing
AP=R†ASR
gives
⟨ψP∣AP∣ψP⟩=⟨ψS∣RR†ASRR†∣ψS⟩=⟨ψS∣AS∣ψS⟩.