WKB Approximation
The WKB approximation is the leading semiclassical approximation for a wavefunction in a slowly varying potential. It assumes that the local de Broglie wavelength changes only slightly over one wavelength, so the wavefunction looks locally like a plane wave with slowly varying amplitude and phase.
Required background. The stationary Schrödinger equation and boundary conditions determine the differential equation and the physical combination of its solutions.
The local meaning of , including its momentum, energy, wavefront, interference, and gauge-covariance interpretations, is developed in Classical Action and Quantum Phase.
For a one-dimensional stationary state,
define the local classical momentum in an allowed region by
The WKB approximation gives oscillatory wavefunctions where and exponential wavefunctions where . It fails at turning points, where and ; the repair uses local Airy Functions and is the subject of Turning Points and Connection Formulas.
Local action and amplitude
Section titled “Local action and amplitude”Use a local phase form
where the dimensionless phase changes by order one over a local wavelength while changes by a small fraction. Substituting into the stationary Schrödinger equation gives
WKB organizes this equation as an expansion in powers of relative to the action scale set by the problem.
The general language of such limiting expansions is summarized in Asymptotic Analysis.
Leading Phase
Section titled “Leading Phase”At leading order,
so
Thus the rapidly varying phase is the classical action integral:
The phase solves the leading Hamilton–Jacobi equation. Its derivative, rather than the arbitrary additive constant in , determines the local momentum.
Amplitude
Section titled “Amplitude”The next order gives the transport equation
Equivalently,
Therefore
In a classically allowed region, the leading WKB wavefunction is
For one traveling branch, the density is proportional to : a conserved flux spends more time where motion is slow. For a standing wave this interpretation applies after averaging its rapid interference fringes, not to its pointwise nodal density.
WKB in Classically Allowed Regions develops this result into traveling and standing branches, current and unit-flux normalizations, dwell-time density, residual tests, and worked smooth-potential examples.
Forbidden Regions
Section titled “Forbidden Regions”In a classically forbidden region, define
The WKB solutions become
One branch grows and one branch decays. Physical boundary conditions usually select the decaying branch far inside a forbidden tail, but in tunneling problems both branches may be needed locally to match across two turning points.
WKB in Classically Forbidden Regions develops the orientation conventions, boundary-condition logic, under-barrier current, residual tests, and tail benchmarks for these exponential branches.
Validity Condition
Section titled “Validity Condition”A useful slow-variation diagnostic is
Equivalently, if
then WKB requires the potential and wavelength to vary little over one local wavelength.
For forbidden regions the analogous condition is
Both conditions fail near a simple turning point because or goes to zero. The first derivative alone is not sufficient for an arbitrary smooth potential. Substituting back into the equation leaves the dimensionless local residual
Requiring both and controls these local terms. Replace by in a forbidden region. A small residual is a local consistency check; a global error estimate must also control accumulation over the interval and sensitivity to boundary conditions.
What WKB Does and Does Not Say
Section titled “What WKB Does and Does Not Say”WKB is local. It gives approximate solutions in regions where the potential varies slowly, but a physical wavefunction also requires global boundary conditions and matching. For bound states, matching across two turning points produces quantization. For barriers, matching across two turning points produces the tunneling exponent.
For an opaque smooth barrier, the leading action often determines the dominant logarithm of transmission. A small relative error in that action can still produce a substantial relative error in an exponentially small probability. Connection formulas determine leading prefactors, and higher orders are needed when that accuracy matters.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Let , with . At , does guarantee a small WKB residual?
Solution
No. At that point , so
It can be large even though the first-derivative diagnostic vanishes. A rapidly varying, small-amplitude modulation can expose this failure.
- Why is WKB exact inside each constant-potential region of a rectangular barrier but insufficient at the interfaces?
Solution
Constant or gives exact plane waves or exponentials and zero local residual. At a discontinuity the slow-variation assumption fails. Continuity of and supplies the interface coefficients; a smooth Airy turning-point formula does not apply there.
References
Section titled “References”- C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, Springer, 1999.
- M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, “Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics”, Reports on Progress in Physics 35, 315-397, 1972.
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1981.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.