Turning Points and Connection Formulas
Leading WKB fails at a classical turning point, where and the local momentum vanishes. Connection formulas repair the approximation by replacing the potential near the turning point with a linear approximation, solving the resulting Airy equation, and matching the Airy asymptotics to WKB forms on both sides.
Required background. Allowed-region WKB and forbidden-region WKB give the branches to match. We consider a smooth, isolated simple turning point with nonzero potential slope.
Failure of WKB at a turning point
Section titled “Failure of WKB at a turning point”The allowed-region WKB form contains
At a turning point ,
The amplitude appears to diverge, and the validity condition
cannot hold. The divergence is not a physical divergence of the exact wavefunction; it is a failure of the local WKB approximation.
Linearized Potential
Section titled “Linearized Potential”Assume a simple turning point:
Near ,
For , the region is classically allowed and is forbidden. The Schrödinger equation becomes
With the scaled variable
this is the Airy equation
The local solutions are linear combinations of and .
The definitions and asymptotic formulas for these functions are collected in Airy Functions.
Airy Matching
Section titled “Airy Matching”Write , so . The leading Airy asymptotics for positive are
For the linear potential, is exactly the dimensionless action integral on either side. The amplitude ratio therefore produces the factor of two below; the phase is fixed by the same Airy solution [Olver; NIST DLMF §9.7].
For an allowed region on the left and forbidden region on the right,
in the forbidden region connects to
in the allowed region .
Here
The independent solution instead connects a growing exponential to a cosine. With and , the leading pair is
These coefficients refer to the resolved Airy basis. Observing only a dominant growing asymptotic branch does not determine an exponentially subdominant coefficient ; retaining that information is essential when matching tunneling amplitudes.
Matching also needs an overlap region. If the linearization varies appreciably over a length , it requires
For example, controls the first neglected Taylor term. Thus is a scale-separation condition, not merely the existence of a root .
Opposite Orientation
Section titled “Opposite Orientation”If the forbidden region lies to the left and the allowed region lies to the right, the decaying forbidden solution
connects to
These formulas assume a single simple turning point and a forbidden-side boundary condition that selects the decaying branch. More general scattering situations may require both Airy solutions and a connection matrix rather than a single decaying-tail formula.
Turning-Point Phase
Section titled “Turning-Point Phase”Each smooth turning point contributes a phase shift of to the allowed-region standing wave. A bound state trapped between two smooth turning points therefore receives a total phase contribution of . This is the origin of the in the one-dimensional Bohr-Sommerfeld rule.
Hard-wall boundaries, singular endpoints, and higher-order turning points can carry different phase corrections. The common shift is a result for two ordinary smooth turning points, not a universal rule for every boundary condition.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Express the allowed-side decaying-tail solution as incoming and reflected traveling waves. Use and identify the reflection amplitude.
Solution
Since , travels toward the right-hand turning point and travels away. Expansion gives
The reflected-to-incoming coefficient ratio is , with . This reflection phase is consistent with the standing-wave offset ; they describe different phase comparisons.
- How does doubling change the width of the simple-turning-point layer for fixed and ? What happens as ?
Solution
The width grows by . As , grows and the linear approximation loses its overlap with WKB. Coalescing or higher-order turning points require a different uniform model; setting in the Airy formula is invalid.
References
Section titled “References”- C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, Springer, 1999.
- M. V. Berry and K. E. Mount, “Semiclassical approximations in wave mechanics”, Reports on Progress in Physics 35, 315-397, 1972.
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, 3rd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, 1981.
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, §9.7: Asymptotic Expansions, Airy-function formulas 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.9, and 9.7.11 (accessed 2026-10-13).
- F. W. J. Olver, Asymptotics and Special Functions, A K Peters, 1997.