Particle on a Ring
A particle on a ring is the canonical quantum system with one periodic angular coordinate. The configuration space is the circle , not an interval with two separate ends. For a free scalar particle with ordinary periodic boundary conditions and no flux, this gives integer angular momentum and equal energies for clockwise and counterclockwise modes.
This page is the angular-systems treatment. For a more introductory route from one-dimensional boxes to periodic motion, see Particle on a Ring: First Encounter.
Helpful background. Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation to formulate an energy eigenvalue problem.
Configuration Space
Section titled “Configuration Space”Let a particle of mass be constrained to a circle of fixed radius . Its position is specified by one angle,
with the identification
The Hilbert space is , with inner product
In the ordinary periodic representation, Hamiltonian-domain wavefunctions are single-valued on the circle (generic states need not have pointwise endpoint values):
For the free second-derivative Hamiltonian, the derivative is periodic as part of the same self-adjoint domain:
The probability density is density per unit angle. Density per unit arc length differs by the factor .
Hamiltonian and Angular Momentum
Section titled “Hamiltonian and Angular Momentum”The moment of inertia is
Classically, the kinetic energy is
In the angle representation,
so the free-ring Hamiltonian is
Thus the ring is a free particle with a compact coordinate. The differential expression resembles a particle in a box, but the boundary condition is periodic rather than Dirichlet or Neumann.
The ring has one periodic coordinate , and the free spectrum is quadratic in the integer angular-momentum label: with . The states and are degenerate when no flux or external field selects an orientation.
Eigenfunctions and Integer Quantum Number
Section titled “Eigenfunctions and Integer Quantum Number”The angular-momentum eigenvalue equation is
Solving gives
Single-valuedness requires
so
Therefore
The normalized eigenfunctions are
The integer can be positive, negative, or zero. Positive and negative values represent opposite orientations of angular momentum around the ring.
Energy Spectrum and Degeneracy
Section titled “Energy Spectrum and Degeneracy”Acting with the Hamiltonian gives
Define
Then
The level is nondegenerate. Every nonzero level is twofold degenerate:
The free ring combines continuous rotational symmetry with time reversal: the rotations give distinct angular-momentum states, and time reversal pairs their equal energies. Time reversal alone does not protect a twofold degeneracy for a spinless particle. A real angle-dependent potential can mix the two modes and split them, as Exercise 3 shows. The two states have equal kinetic energy but opposite angular momentum:
The ground state has because the constant wavefunction has no angular variation and therefore no kinetic energy. This does not contradict the harmonic oscillator’s zero-point energy; the ring has no confining angular potential with a finite-width minimum.
Probability Current Around the Ring
Section titled “Probability Current Around the Ring”For the angular Schrödinger equation,
the angular probability density obeys
The angular probability current is
For the eigenstate ,
The density of is constant, but the current is not zero unless . This is a useful warning: a stationary probability density does not imply the absence of probability flow.
Relation to Translations on a Compact Space
Section titled “Relation to Translations on a Compact Space”The ring is also the periodic-box basis written geometrically. If is arc length and is the circumference, then periodicity gives
The tangential momentum is
and the angular momentum is
The energy
is the same spectrum written in linear or angular language. This is the simplest example of how compact configuration spaces quantize generator eigenvalues.
Magnetic Flux Preview
Section titled “Magnetic Flux Preview”If the particle has charge , magnetic flux through the ring shifts the spectrum even when the magnetic field vanishes on the ring itself. This is the ring version of the Aharonov–Bohm effect.
With a tangential vector potential representing flux , minimal coupling gives
Define the dimensionless flux
The single-valued basis remains convenient, and the energies become
The canonical angular momentum remains , while mechanical angular momentum is and carries the current. The sign of depends on the sign of the charge and on the chosen orientation for . The invariant lesson is that flux shifts the parabola in and can split the degeneracy.
For a normalized mode, the probability current and circulating charge current are
The derivative is taken on a fixed eigenstate branch. The spectrum as a set is periodic in with period , since ; a fixed branch need not be periodic.
Equivalently, one may remove the vector potential locally and impose a twisted boundary condition. In this convention obeys and the same twist for its derivative. Exercise 1 verifies the sign. The general rule behind this preview is Minimal Coupling in Wave Mechanics, and the full wave-mechanics phase discussion is Aharonov–Bohm Effect: First Encounter.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Treating and as independent endpoints.
- Allowing arbitrary real for an ordinary single-valued scalar wavefunction.
- Forgetting the negative angular-momentum states.
- Confusing the particle mass with the angular quantum number .
- Thinking the constant ground state contradicts oscillator zero-point energy.
- Inferring zero current from a time-independent density.
- Ignoring charge and orientation conventions when writing the flux-shifted spectrum.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Verify the equivalence between the periodic-gauge flux Hamiltonian and the free differential operator acting on twisted functions . Why can the twist be discarded only at integer ?
Solution
Write . Direct differentiation gives
so . Periodicity of and gives the twist for both and . The allowed free-operator modes are therefore , with the same flux-shifted energies. Their ordinary derivative current equals the mechanical current in the periodic gauge.
Only when is this the ordinary periodic domain. Removing the vector potential while silently keeping periodic functions at noninteger changes the physical problem and loses the flux dependence.
- For one particle in the lowest energy level, determine the circulating charge current as a function of . What happens at ? Compare an equal mixture of with their coherent equal superposition at that flux.
Solution
Away from half-integers, the minimizing label is the nearest integer to , giving
This is a piecewise linear periodic ground-state current. At , and are degenerate and carry opposite currents . The energy minimum has a cusp there, so its derivative does not assign a unique current to the degenerate ground space. The preparation matters.
Both the equal incoherent mixture and have zero current. Their densities differ:
For the coherent state, substitution into shows that the current vanishes pointwise at half flux. The nonuniform density is stationary because its two components have the same energy.
- With no flux, add a weak real potential , where . Does time reversal keep the first excited pair degenerate?
Solution
The Fourier components of change by . Its matrix in the ordered pair is
The degenerate perturbation prescription therefore gives energies . The leading eigenfunctions can be chosen as and , which are real standing waves with zero current.
The real potential preserves spinless time reversal but breaks continuous rotation symmetry. There is no protected doublet: time reversal can leave each real eigenstate invariant rather than map it to an independent equal-energy state.
References
Section titled “References”- Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory,” Physical Review 115, 485–491 (1959), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.115.485.
- D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.