Skip to content

A displaced oscillator is a harmonic oscillator whose equilibrium position has been shifted by a linear term in the potential. The curvature is unchanged, so the energy spacing remains ℏω\hbar\omega, but all eigenfunctions are translated and all energies acquire a constant offset.

The simplest form is

H^F=p^22m+12mω2x^2−Fx^,\hat H_F = \frac{\hat p^2}{2m} +\frac12m\omega^2\hat x^2 -F\hat x,

where FF is a constant force. This model is the first exact example behind static forcing, displaced molecular potential surfaces, coherent-state preparation by sudden shifts, and linear couplings to oscillator coordinates.

Helpful background. Quantum Harmonic Oscillator to recognize oscillator energies, lengths, and eigenfunctions.

Write the potential as

VF(x)=12mω2x2−Fx.V_F(x) = \frac12m\omega^2x^2-Fx.

The shifted equilibrium is found by minimizing:

dVFdx=mω2x−F=0.\frac{dV_F}{dx} = m\omega^2x-F=0.

Thus

xF=Fmω2.x_F=\frac{F}{m\omega^2}.

Completing the square gives

VF(x)=12mω2(x−xF)2−F22mω2.V_F(x) = \frac12m\omega^2(x-x_F)^2 -\frac{F^2}{2m\omega^2}.

Therefore

H^F=p^22m+12mω2(x^−xF)2−F22mω2.\hat H_F = \frac{\hat p^2}{2m} +\frac12m\omega^2(\hat x-x_F)^2 -\frac{F^2}{2m\omega^2}.

The linear term has not changed the curvature mω2m\omega^2. It has only moved the minimum and lowered the whole parabola by a constant.

Since the shifted coordinate

y=x−xFy=x-x_F

has the same oscillator curvature, the spectrum is

En(F)=ℏω(n+12)−F22mω2,n=0,1,2,…E_n(F) = \hbar\omega \left( n+\frac12 \right) -\frac{F^2}{2m\omega^2}, \qquad n=0,1,2,\ldots

The level spacing is unchanged:

En+1(F)−En(F)=ℏω.E_{n+1}(F)-E_n(F)=\hbar\omega.

The constant offset matters when comparing two Hamiltonians with different forces or equilibrium positions. It does not change transition frequencies between adjacent levels of one fixed displaced oscillator.

Let ψn(0)(x)\psi_n^{(0)}(x) be the ordinary oscillator eigenfunction centered at the origin. The displaced-oscillator eigenfunctions are

ψn(F)(x)=ψn(0)(x−xF).\psi_n^{(F)}(x) = \psi_n^{(0)}(x-x_F).

In particular, the ground state is

ψ0(F)(x)=(1πℓ2)1/4exp⁡[−(x−xF)22ℓ2],\psi_0^{(F)}(x) = \left(\frac{1}{\pi\ell^2}\right)^{1/4} \exp\left[ -\frac{(x-x_F)^2}{2\ell^2} \right],

with the same oscillator length

ℓ=ℏmω.\ell=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}}.

The mean position in the shifted ground state is

⟨x⟩F=xF,\langle x\rangle_F=x_F,

while the position uncertainty is unchanged:

Δx=ℓ2.\Delta x=\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2}.

The oscillator has moved; it has not become wider or narrower.

The unitary translation operator

T^(xF)=exp⁡(−iℏxFp^)\hat T(x_F) = \exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}x_F\hat p\right)

acts in position representation as

(T^(xF)ψ)(x)=ψ(x−xF).(\hat T(x_F)\psi)(x)=\psi(x-x_F).

Thus the displaced eigenstates are translated ordinary eigenstates:

∣n;F⟩=T^(xF)∣n⟩.\lvert n;F\rangle = \hat T(x_F)\lvert n\rangle.

This also gives a quick way to check expectation values:

⟨n;F∣x^∣n;F⟩=xF,⟨n;F∣p^∣n;F⟩=0.\langle n;F\vert\hat x\vert n;F\rangle=x_F, \qquad \langle n;F\vert\hat p\vert n;F\rangle=0.

The translation is spatial. It should not be confused with changing the oscillator frequency.

Using

x^=ℓ2(a^+a^†),\hat x = \frac{\ell}{\sqrt2} \left( \hat a+\hat a^\dagger \right),

the Hamiltonian becomes

H^F=ℏω(a^†a^+12)−Fℓ2(a^+a^†).\hat H_F = \hbar\omega \left( \hat a^\dagger\hat a+\frac12 \right) -\frac{F\ell}{\sqrt2} \left( \hat a+\hat a^\dagger \right).

Define

η=Fℓ2 ℏω=xF2 ℓ,\eta = \frac{F\ell}{\sqrt2\,\hbar\omega} = \frac{x_F}{\sqrt2\,\ell},

and a shifted annihilation operator

b^=a^−η.\hat b=\hat a-\eta.

Since η\eta is a number,

[b^,b^†]=1.[\hat b,\hat b^\dagger]=1.

Substitution gives

H^F=ℏω(b^†b^+12)−ℏωη2.\hat H_F = \hbar\omega \left( \hat b^\dagger\hat b+\frac12 \right) -\hbar\omega\eta^2.

Because

ℏωη2=F22mω2,\hbar\omega\eta^2 = \frac{F^2}{2m\omega^2},

this is the same spectrum found by completing the square.

The shifted ground state satisfies

b^∣0;F⟩=0,\hat b\lvert0;F\rangle=0,

or

a^∣0;F⟩=η∣0;F⟩.\hat a\lvert0;F\rangle=\eta\lvert0;F\rangle.

Relative to the original oscillator centered at zero, the new ground state is a coherent state with real amplitude η\eta. Relative to the new Hamiltonian, it is simply the ground state.

A static displacement changes the Hamiltonian from H^0\hat H_0 to H^F\hat H_F. If the force is present from the start, the stationary states are the shifted eigenstates above.

If the force is suddenly switched on while the system is in an eigenstate of the old oscillator, the state is generally not an eigenstate of the new Hamiltonian. The wave packet then oscillates around the new equilibrium. Starting from the old ground state produces coherent-state motion. Starting from an excited number state instead gives a displaced number state, with a moving center but a non-Gaussian density.

If the force is changed slowly enough and the relevant gap remains open, the state can follow the instantaneous shifted eigenstate adiabatically. Time-dependent driving and adiabaticity are dynamical questions; the static page here supplies the exactly solvable Hamiltonian used in those later analyses.

For a charged oscillator in a uniform static electric field, F=qEF=qE. The equilibrium shift is

xF=qEmω2,x_F=\frac{qE}{m\omega^2},

and the energy shift is

ΔE=−q2E22mω2.\Delta E = -\frac{q^2E^2}{2m\omega^2}.

This is the oscillator version of an induced-dipole energy. It is a simple model for polarizability, not a full atomic Stark-effect calculation.

In molecular physics, two electronic configurations may have approximately harmonic nuclear potentials with different equilibrium positions. Vibrational wavefunctions on one surface then overlap shifted wavefunctions on another surface. Those overlaps are the beginning of Franck–Condon physics; the detailed spectroscopy belongs in the atoms, molecules, and light volume.

In oscillator-bath and polaron models, linear couplings to oscillator coordinates are often removed by completing the square or by a displacement transformation. Polarons Preview applies the same idea mode by mode, where recoil, convergence, and the bare-particle overlap add new physics.

  • Treating the linear term as if it changed the level spacing.
  • Forgetting the constant energy shift −F2/(2mω2)-F^2/(2m\omega^2).
  • Shifting the coordinate but forgetting to shift the wavefunction argument.
  • Confusing the shifted ground state with an excited state of the shifted Hamiltonian.
  • Saying “coherent state” without specifying whether the reference Hamiltonian is the old or shifted oscillator.
  • Applying the static displaced-oscillator spectrum directly to a time-dependent driven oscillator.
  • Ignoring the sign convention: V(x)=mω2x2/2−FxV(x)=m\omega^2x^2/2-Fx shifts the minimum to +F/(mω2)+F/(m\omega^2).
  1. Complete the square for V(x)=mω2x2/2−FxV(x)=m\omega^2x^2/2-Fx and identify the shifted minimum.
Solution

Set

xF=Fmω2.x_F=\frac{F}{m\omega^2}.

Then

12mω2(x−xF)2=12mω2x2−mω2xFx+12mω2xF2.\frac12m\omega^2(x-x_F)^2 = \frac12m\omega^2x^2 -m\omega^2x_Fx +\frac12m\omega^2x_F^2.

Since mω2xF=Fm\omega^2x_F=F,

12mω2x2−Fx=12mω2(x−xF)2−12mω2xF2.\frac12m\omega^2x^2-Fx = \frac12m\omega^2(x-x_F)^2 -\frac12m\omega^2x_F^2.

Thus

V(x)=12mω2(x−xF)2−F22mω2.V(x) = \frac12m\omega^2(x-x_F)^2 -\frac{F^2}{2m\omega^2}.
  1. Find the spectrum of H^F\hat H_F.
Solution

After completing the square, H^F\hat H_F is an ordinary oscillator in the coordinate x−xFx-x_F plus a constant:

H^F=p^22m+12mω2(x^−xF)2−F22mω2.\hat H_F = \frac{\hat p^2}{2m} +\frac12m\omega^2(\hat x-x_F)^2 -\frac{F^2}{2m\omega^2}.

Therefore

En(F)=ℏω(n+12)−F22mω2.E_n(F) = \hbar\omega \left( n+\frac12 \right) -\frac{F^2}{2m\omega^2}.
  1. Show that the shifted ground-state wavefunction has the same uncertainty Δx\Delta x as the unshifted ground state.
Solution

The shifted ground state is

ψ0(F)(x)=ψ0(0)(x−xF).\psi_0^{(F)}(x) = \psi_0^{(0)}(x-x_F).

A translation changes the mean position but not the width. Explicitly,

⟨x⟩F=xF,\langle x\rangle_F=x_F,

and

⟨(x−xF)2⟩F=ℓ22.\langle (x-x_F)^2\rangle_F=\frac{\ell^2}{2}.

Thus

Δx=ℓ2,\Delta x=\frac{\ell}{\sqrt2},

the same as for the unshifted oscillator.

  1. An oscillator starts in the ground state ∣0⟩\lvert0\rangle of H^0\hat H_0. A constant force FF is switched on suddenly, so the state is unchanged during the switch. Find the probabilities of measuring the new energies En(F)E_n(F) and the mean energy immediately afterward. What is the probability of the new ground state when xF=2 ℓx_F=\sqrt2\,\ell?
Solution

The old vacuum obeys a^∣0⟩=0\hat a\lvert0\rangle=0, so the shifted annihilation operator gives

b^∣0⟩=−η∣0⟩,η=xF2 ℓ.\hat b\lvert0\rangle=-\eta\lvert0\rangle, \qquad \eta=\frac{x_F}{\sqrt2\,\ell}.

It is therefore a coherent state with amplitude −η-\eta in the new oscillator basis. Using the number expansion of a coherent state,

∣0⟩=e−η2/2∑n=0∞(−η)nn!∣n;F⟩,PF(n)=e−η2η2nn!.\lvert0\rangle =e^{-\eta^2/2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-\eta)^n}{\sqrt{n!}}\lvert n;F\rangle, \qquad P_F(n)=e^{-\eta^2}\frac{\eta^{2n}}{n!}.

This Poisson distribution has mean occupation η2\eta^2. Keeping the constant offset in the new energies gives

⟨HF⟩=ℏω(η2+12)−ℏωη2=12ℏω.\langle H_F\rangle =\hbar\omega\left(\eta^2+\frac12\right) -\hbar\omega\eta^2 =\frac12\hbar\omega.

This also follows directly from ⟨0∣H^F∣0⟩=⟨0∣H^0∣0⟩−F⟨0∣x^∣0⟩\langle0|\hat H_F|0\rangle=\langle0|\hat H_0|0\rangle-F\langle0|\hat x|0\rangle. The unchanged mean energy does not imply that the state is the new ground state: its mean excitation energy above E0(F)E_0(F) is ℏωη2\hbar\omega\eta^2. At xF=2 ℓx_F=\sqrt2\,\ell, η=1\eta=1 and PF(0)=e−1≈0.368P_F(0)=e^{-1}\approx0.368. A sudden change of equilibrium does not instantly translate the wavefunction to the new minimum.

  • C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
  • D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  • J. R. Klauder and B.-S. Skagerstam, Coherent States, World Scientific, 1985.
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.
  • B. Zwiebach, “Quantum Dynamics”, 8.05 Quantum Physics II, MIT OpenCourseWare, Fall 2013, §4.4.