Spin Measurements
A spin measurement is a measurement of a chosen spin component. For spin-, measuring along a unit axis means measuring
The possible outcomes are
The axis is part of the measurement specification. The invariant has the fixed value , but it does not specify a spin projection. To predict the two outcomes , one must name the measured component, such as , , or .
This page applies the projective measurement formalism to spin. The physical Stern–Gerlach analyzer model is treated in Stern–Gerlach Revisited, and the general measurement rules are treated in Projective Measurement.
Measurement Along z
Section titled “Measurement Along z”In the standard basis,
with
The corresponding projectors are
and
For a normalized state
the Born probabilities are
These probabilities describe the specified measurement. The formula alone neither assigns pre-existing values to all spin components nor rules out every hidden-variable model; such claims require additional assumptions and experiments.
Arbitrary-Axis Projectors
Section titled “Arbitrary-Axis Projectors”Let
be a unit vector. The spin component along is
Because
the eigenvalues of are , and the eigenvalues of are .
The projectors are
They obey the projective-measurement identities
and
Thus is the two-outcome projective measurement associated with the spin component .
Probabilities from Spinors
Section titled “Probabilities from Spinors”For a pure state , the probability of outcome along is
If the state is the eigenstate, where is the angle between and , then
and
For example, measured along has , so both outcomes have probability .
Probabilities from the Bloch Vector
Section titled “Probabilities from the Bloch Vector”For a spin- density operator,
where , the measurement probabilities are
This is the compact Bloch-sphere form of the Born rule. The component of the Bloch vector along the analyzer axis controls the bias; transverse components affect other axes but not this outcome probability directly.
The expectation value is
Thus a state can have zero expectation value along an axis while still giving two possible outcomes .
State Update
Section titled “State Update”If the outcome along occurs in an ideal selective projective measurement, a pure state updates as
Similarly, outcome gives
For density operators, the update is
These conditional formulas apply only when the outcome has nonzero probability. They describe the ideal repeatable (Lüders) measurement; a device with the same outcome probabilities can apply an additional transformation afterward. This is a conditional state assignment after a specified outcome. It is not a full microscopic model of a detector.
If this ideal measurement is performed but its recorded outcome is disregarded, the nonselective update is
In Bloch-vector language, this keeps only the component of along :
The measurement removes coherence between the two eigenspaces of .
Noncommuting Axes
Section titled “Noncommuting Axes”Spin measurements along different axes are generally incompatible. For two unit vectors and ,
Here also denotes a nonunit vector ; the cross product has length . If the axes are neither parallel nor antiparallel, the spin- commutator is nonzero. A state prepared with definite is therefore not generally definite in .
For spin-,
An measurement of a state gives equal probabilities. If one outcome is selected, the post-measurement state is an eigenstate, and a later measurement again has equal probabilities. This is the spin version of the general Sequential Measurements rule.
Repeated and Sequential Measurements
Section titled “Repeated and Sequential Measurements”Repeated measurement along the same axis is deterministic in the ideal projective model. If a measurement of gives and is immediately repeated, the second measurement gives with probability because the state has been updated into the eigenspace.
Changing the axis changes the measurement. A useful three-step example is:
- prepare ;
- measure and select ;
- measure again.
The final measurement gives
The intermediate selection prepares a new state. It does not merely reveal a value while leaving the original certainty intact.
Connection to Stern–Gerlach
Section titled “Connection to Stern–Gerlach”An ideal Stern–Gerlach analyzer oriented along is the standard physical picture for the measurement . The apparatus correlates the two spin projectors with two spatial output paths.
For how magnetic forces separate the output paths, and where the ideal measurement approximation enters, see Stern–Gerlach Revisited.
Common Mistakes
Section titled “Common Mistakes”- Saying “measure spin” without specifying the axis.
- Using and for every axis instead of only the chosen basis.
- Forgetting that changes when the analyzer axis changes.
- Treating the post-measurement state as the same as the pre-measurement state after a selective outcome.
- Assuming that definite implies definite .
- Confusing expectation value with a single-shot outcome.
- Treating the projective update rule as a complete physical detector model.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- A state is . Find the probabilities for an measurement.
Solution
In the basis,
Therefore
- A spin starts in . It is measured along an axis making angle with , and the outcome is discarded. Find the probability of in a final measurement.
Solution
Initially . The nonselective intermediate measurement gives , so
It is one for parallel or antiparallel analyzer axes and for a perpendicular axis. Discarding the outcome does not undo the measurement disturbance.
- Verify that are orthogonal projectors.
Solution
Use
Then
Also,
- A spin is prepared in , then is measured and the outcome is selected. What are the probabilities for a later measurement?
Solution
After selecting , the state is . In the basis,
Therefore the later probabilities are
References
Section titled “References”- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
- A. Peres, Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods, Kluwer, 1995.
- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.