Skip to content

Delta-Function Potential as Self-Adjoint Extension

A delta potential is a self-adjoint realization of a differential expression with a matching condition, rather than multiplication by an ordinary function. Its resolvent differs from the free resolvent by a rank-one operator. That formula connects the derivative jump, the attractive bound state, and the limit of an impenetrable barrier. Delta-Function Potential develops the elementary model solution; this page develops its operator realization.

Required background. Quadratic Form Methods constructs the point interaction and derives its domain. Free-Particle Hamiltonian supplies the Green function used below.

A point interaction is encoded in a derivative jump

Section titled “A point interaction is encoded in a derivative jump”

Let α=ℏ2/(2m)>0\alpha=\hbar^2/(2m)>0 and let g∈Rg\in\mathbb R have units of energy times length. On L2(R)L^2(\mathbb R) the closed form

qg[ψ]=α∥ψ′∥2+g∣ψ(0)∣2,Q=H1(R),q_g[\psi]=\alpha\|\psi'\|^2+g|\psi(0)|^2, \qquad Q=H^1(\mathbb R),

determines the self-adjoint operator HgH_g. The trace estimate and form construction are proved in the required background. Restoring α\alpha, its domain is

D(Hg)={ψ∈H1(R):  ψ∣R−,ψ∣R+∈H2,ψ′(0+)−ψ′(0−)=gαψ(0)}.\begin{aligned} D(H_g)=\{\psi\in H^1(\mathbb R):\;& \psi|_{\mathbb R_-},\psi|_{\mathbb R_+}\in H^2,\\ &\psi'(0+)-\psi'(0-)=\frac g\alpha\psi(0)\}. \end{aligned}

The action on each open half-line is −αψ′′-\alpha\psi''. Global H1H^1 membership imposes continuity of ψ\psi. The derivative may jump.

This domain also explains the formal distributional notation. For a continuous piecewise H2H^2 function,

ψ′′=ψpieces′′+[ψ′(0+)−ψ′(0−)]δ0.\psi''=\psi''_{\mathrm{pieces}}+ \bigl[\psi'(0+)-\psi'(0-)\bigr]\delta_0.

Thus the singular terms in −αψ′′+gψ(0)δ0-\alpha\psi''+g\psi(0)\delta_0 cancel exactly on D(Hg)D(H_g), leaving an L2L^2 vector. Applying the formal expression to arbitrary H2H^2 vectors would not produce the interacting operator domain.

The punctured free differential operator admits other self-adjoint extensions, including ones allowing discontinuous functions. The continuous matching condition above selects the delta family; it is not a classification of all point interactions.

The resolvent differs from the free one by rank one

Section titled “The resolvent differs from the free one by rank one”

Write Rg(z)=(Hg−z)−1R_g(z)=(H_g-z)^{-1}. For z∉[0,∞)z\notin[0,\infty) choose kk with z=αk2z=\alpha k^2 and Im⁡k>0\operatorname{Im}k>0. The free resolvent kernel is

Gz(x)=i2αkeik∣x∣.G_z(x)=\frac{i}{2\alpha k}e^{ik|x|}.

The distributional equation for ψ=Rg(z)f\psi=R_g(z)f gives

ψ=R0(z)f−gψ(0)Gz.\psi=R_0(z)f-g\psi(0)G_z.

Evaluation at zero is legitimate because R0(z)f∈H2R_0(z)f\in H^2 and Gz∈H1G_z\in H^1. If 1+gGz(0)≠01+gG_z(0)\ne0, it yields

ψ(0)=(R0(z)f)(0)1+gGz(0).\psi(0)=\frac{(R_0(z)f)(0)}{1+gG_z(0)}.

Consequently

Rg(z;x,y)=Gz(x−y)−gGz(x)Gz(−y)1+gGz(0).R_g(z;x,y)=G_z(x-y)- \frac{gG_z(x)G_z(-y)}{1+gG_z(0)}.

The second term is bounded and rank one: GzG_z is an L2L^2 function, and integration against Gz(−y)G_z(-y) is a bounded functional. No claim that the delta distribution itself is a bounded Hilbert-space perturbation is required. The formula can conversely be checked against the matching domain and the resolvent equation, establishing it without a formal operator sum.

The negative-energy pole gives the unique bound state

Section titled “The negative-energy pole gives the unique bound state”

At z=−ακ2z=-\alpha\kappa^2, κ>0\kappa>0, one has Gz(0)=1/(2ακ)G_z(0)=1/(2\alpha\kappa). The denominator vanishes precisely when

κ=−g2α>0.\kappa=-\frac{g}{2\alpha}>0.

Thus an attractive interaction g<0g<0 has one bound state,

Eb=−g24α,ψb(x)=κ e−κ∣x∣.E_b=-\frac{g^2}{4\alpha},\qquad \psi_b(x)=\sqrt{\kappa}\,e^{-\kappa|x|}.

The normalization uses ∫e−2κ∣x∣dx=1/κ\int e^{-2\kappa|x|}dx=1/\kappa. The resolvent denominator has only this negative zero, so there are no additional negative eigenvalues. For g≥0g\geq0, the nonnegative form also excludes negative energies directly.

The finite-rank resolvent difference preserves the essential spectrum, which is [0,∞)[0,\infty). Square-integrability excludes positive-energy piecewise oscillatory eigenfunctions and the zero-energy piecewise affine solution. The explicit one-dimensional spectral analysis gives absolutely continuous spectrum on [0,∞)[0,\infty); there is no singular-continuous part.

For comparison, the standard left-incident scattering amplitudes are

r(k)=g2iαk−g,t(k)=2iαk2iαk−g,k>0.r(k)=\frac{g}{2i\alpha k-g},\qquad t(k)=\frac{2i\alpha k}{2i\alpha k-g},\qquad k>0.

Their matching derivation belongs to Scattering from a Delta Potential. They satisfy ∣r∣2+∣t∣2=1|r|^2+|t|^2=1, and their upper-half-plane pole for g<0g<0 is the same bound-state pole found from the resolvent.

Exercise: an infinite repulsive barrier separates the line

Section titled “Exercise: an infinite repulsive barrier separates the line”

Use the resolvent formula to identify the limit g→+∞g\to+\infty at a fixed nonreal zz.

Solution

The coefficient g/(1+gGz(0))g/(1+gG_z(0)) tends to 1/Gz(0)1/G_z(0). Because the remaining rank-one operator is fixed and bounded, the convergence is in operator norm. The limiting kernel is

Gz(x−y)−Gz(x)Gz(−y)Gz(0).G_z(x-y)-\frac{G_z(x)G_z(-y)}{G_z(0)}.

For xx and yy on opposite sides of zero the two terms coincide and cancel. On either half-line the remaining expression is the method-of-images Dirichlet Green function. The limit is therefore the direct sum of the two half-line Dirichlet Hamiltonians. This is norm-resolvent convergence to decoupled dynamics, not convergence of HgH_g as bounded operators.

  • Albeverio, Sergio, Friedrich Gesztesy, Raphael Høegh-Krohn, and Helge Holden, Solvable Models in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., AMS Chelsea Publishing, 2005, publisher edition — one-dimensional point interactions and their resolvents.
  • Teschl, Gerald, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Graduate Studies in Mathematics 157, American Mathematical Society, 2014, author’s text, Chapters 6 and 9 — form perturbations and one-dimensional spectral theory.