Irreducible Representations of the CCR
A Weyl representation is irreducible when no proper nonzero closed subspace is preserved by every represented canonical displacement. Equivalently, the only bounded operators commuting with all displacements are scalars. This hypothesis removes spectator multiplicities from the Stone–von Neumann theorem. It concerns the entire canonical representation, not the spectrum of one Hamiltonian or the purity of a chosen state.
Required background. The Weyl Form of the CCR defines the bounded relations. The Schrödinger Representation supplies a regular irreducible realization.
Invariant subspaces are reducing for the Weyl family
Section titled “Invariant subspaces are reducing for the Weyl family”Let be Weyl unitaries on . A closed subspace is invariant if for every . Since is also in the family, invariance holds in both directions and for adjoints. Thus is invariant as well.
Writing for the orthogonal projection onto , this is equivalent to
Such a subspace is called reducing. Irreducibility therefore means that the bounded commutant
contains no projections other than and . The use of bounded operators avoids trying to define a commutant through formal unbounded products on unspecified domains.
Why the commutant must be scalar
Section titled “Why the commutant must be scalar”If a bounded self-adjoint commutes with every Weyl unitary, its spectral projections do too. This follows from the bounded spectral calculus: commutation passes first through polynomials and then to the spectral projections by the relevant limiting construction. If the Weyl family is irreducible, every such projection is either zero or identity, forcing the spectral measure of to be concentrated at a single point. Thus .
For a general bounded , both its real and imaginary self-adjoint parts belong to . Each is scalar, hence is scalar. Conversely, if , a reducing-subspace projection can only be zero or identity. This proves the complex Hilbert-space form of Schur’s lemma relevant here.
The Schrödinger example satisfies this criterion: commuting with all modulations forces a bounded operator to be a multiplication operator, and commuting also with all translations forces the multiplier to be constant almost everywhere. The proof belongs to The Schrödinger Representation; the present criterion explains how to use its conclusion.
Adding a spectator destroys irreducibility
Section titled “Adding a spectator destroys irreducibility”Let be the Schrödinger representation and take
The Weyl phase and strong continuity are unchanged. But is a nontrivial commuting projection, so this representation is reducible.
In fact its commutant is exactly . To see this, write a bounded operator as a matrix of bounded operators on . Commutation with requires every matrix entry to commute with . Irreducibility of the latter makes every entry scalar, leaving an arbitrary matrix on the spectator factor.
This representation cannot be unitarily equivalent to one Schrödinger copy, because unitary equivalence carries commutants into commutants. The abstract Hilbert spaces can nevertheless be isomorphic as infinite-dimensional separable spaces. Representation equivalence must intertwine the labeled Weyl operators, not merely identify the vector spaces.
The general finite-degree regular multiplicity theorem is stated on the Stone–von Neumann Theorem page. Irreducibility is precisely the condition selecting a one-dimensional multiplicity space.
Cyclicity and dynamical symmetries answer different questions
Section titled “Cyclicity and dynamical symmetries answer different questions”A vector is cyclic when the closed linear span of is all of . In an irreducible representation, every nonzero vector is cyclic: the closed orbit span is nonzero and invariant under all Weyl operators, so it must be the whole space.
The converse implication from one cyclic vector to irreducibility is false for general star representations. For example, diagonal matrices on have the cyclic vector , but preserve both coordinate axes. A state-generated representation can therefore be cyclic by construction and still reducible; a GNS construction alone does not establish irreducibility.
Nor does a conserved quantity for one chosen Hamiltonian automatically lie in . Oscillator number commutes with the oscillator Hamiltonian, but not with arbitrary canonical displacements. Parity provides another instructive example: in the Schrödinger representation,
Parity transforms the representation labels instead of commuting with each fixed labeled operator. Its even and odd subspaces need not be invariant under translations. Irreducibility of the CCR is therefore compatible with a Hamiltonian having symmetries and a nontrivial eigenbasis.
Exercise: equivalence preserves irreducibility
Section titled “Exercise: equivalence preserves irreducibility”Suppose for a unitary . Show that carries onto , and use this to rule out equivalence between one and two identical irreducible copies.
Solution
Conjugating gives the required commutation with ; conjugation by gives the inverse map. Scalars map to scalars and nontrivial projections to nontrivial projections. One irreducible copy has scalar commutant, whereas two copies possess the projection onto the first summand. Hence no intertwining unitary can exist.
References
Section titled “References”- J. Dereziński, “Introduction to Representations of the Canonical Commutation and Anticommutation Relations”, arXiv:math-ph/0511030, 2005 — irreducibility, regular representations, and the multiplicity form of the finite-dimensional CCR theorem.
- B. C. Hall, Quantum Theory for Mathematicians, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 267, Springer, 2013 — the Schrödinger representation and Stone–von Neumann theorem.