Skip to content

Lagrangian Mechanics Review

Lagrangian mechanics describes classical motion by making an action functional stationary. It is the configuration-space language behind Euler–Lagrange equations, normal-mode expansions, path integrals, and many semiclassical approximations.

The core object is a Lagrangian

L(q,q˙,t),L(q,\dot q,t),

where qq denotes generalized coordinates and q˙=dq/dt\dot q=dq/dt. The action assigned to a path is

S[q]=∫titfL(q,q˙,t) dt.S[q] = \int_{t_i}^{t_f} L(q,\dot q,t)\,dt.

Classical paths are stationary points of this functional under allowed variations. The full mathematical derivation belongs to Calculus of Variations. This page reviews the mechanics version and the quantum bridges.

Helpful background. Calculus of Variations explains how a functional changes when a whole path is varied; ordinary partial derivatives are used throughout.

The action assigns a number to an entire path. In a quantum path integral it appears in the phase eiS/ℏe^{iS/\hbar}; in classical mechanics its stationary paths satisfy the equations of motion. We first establish that classical calculation in familiar particle examples.

Generalized coordinates are coordinates qiq^i on the configuration space of a system. They need not be Cartesian coordinates. Examples include:

  • the angle θ\theta of a pendulum;
  • polar coordinates (r,θ)(r,\theta) for planar motion;
  • normal-mode amplitudes for small oscillations;
  • collective coordinates in approximate or reduced models.

For nn generalized coordinates, a path is

t↦q(t)=(q1(t),…,qn(t)).t\mapsto q(t) = (q^1(t),\ldots,q^n(t)).

The velocity coordinates are

q˙i(t)=dqidt.\dot q^i(t) = \frac{dq^i}{dt}.

A Lagrangian is a function on positions, velocities, and time:

L=L(q1,…,qn,q˙1,…,q˙n,t).L = L(q^1,\ldots,q^n,\dot q^1,\ldots,\dot q^n,t).

For many elementary systems,

L=T−V,L=T-V,

kinetic energy minus potential energy. This formula is useful, but it is not the definition of all possible Lagrangians. Magnetic couplings, velocity-dependent potentials, constraints, and field theories can require more general forms.

The action is a functional: its input is an entire path and its output is a number. For fixed endpoint data,

q(ti)=qi,q(tf)=qf,q(t_i)=q_i, \qquad q(t_f)=q_f,

one varies the path by

qi(t)⟼qi(t)+ϵηi(t),q^i(t) \longmapsto q^i(t)+\epsilon\eta^i(t),

with

ηi(ti)=ηi(tf)=0.\eta^i(t_i)=\eta^i(t_f)=0.

The classical path satisfies

ddϵS[q+ϵη]∣ϵ=0=0\left. \frac{d}{d\epsilon} S[q+\epsilon\eta] \right\rvert_{\epsilon=0} = 0

for every allowed variation ηi(t)\eta^i(t).

The word “stationary” is deliberate. The classical path need not minimize the action. It may be a saddle point, especially in real-time mechanics and path-integral applications.

Stationary action gives one Euler–Lagrange equation for each generalized coordinate:

ddt(∂L∂q˙i)−∂L∂qi=0.\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q^i} \right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial q^i} = 0.

Equivalently,

∂L∂qi−ddt(∂L∂q˙i)=0.\frac{\partial L}{\partial q^i} - \frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q^i} \right) = 0.

These equations are second-order ordinary differential equations when LL is regular in the velocities. Initial conditions usually specify both qi(t0)q^i(t_0) and q˙i(t0)\dot q^i(t_0). Boundary-value problems, such as fixed endpoints in a propagator, specify data at two times and can have zero, one, or many classical solutions.

For a one-dimensional free particle,

L=12mx˙2.L = \frac12m\dot x^2.

The Euler–Lagrange equation is

ddt(mx˙)=0,\frac{d}{dt} \left( m\dot x \right) = 0,

so

mx¨=0.m\ddot x=0.

The classical path is a straight line in time:

xcl(t)=xi+xf−xitf−ti(t−ti)x_{\mathrm{cl}}(t) = x_i+ \frac{x_f-x_i}{t_f-t_i}(t-t_i)

for fixed endpoints xix_i and xfx_f.

The classical action along this path is

Scl=m(xf−xi)22(tf−ti).S_{\mathrm{cl}} = \frac{m(x_f-x_i)^2}{2(t_f-t_i)}.

This action appears in the phase of the exact free-particle propagator. Its units are energy times time, so Scl/ℏS_{\mathrm{cl}}/\hbar is dimensionless.

For a harmonic oscillator,

L=12mx˙2−12mω2x2.L = \frac12m\dot x^2 - \frac12m\omega^2x^2.

The partial derivatives are

∂L∂x=−mω2x,∂L∂x˙=mx˙.\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = -m\omega^2x, \qquad \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x} = m\dot x.

The Euler–Lagrange equation gives

mx¨+mω2x=0.m\ddot x+m\omega^2x=0.

This is the classical equation whose stable equilibrium becomes the local model behind the Quantum Harmonic Oscillator. Around a stable minimum of a potential, the quadratic approximation to V(x)V(x) gives oscillator dynamics.

For a particle in a plane with polar coordinates (r,θ)(r,\theta) and central potential V(r)V(r),

L=12m(r˙2+r2θ˙2)−V(r).L = \frac12m \left( \dot r^2+r^2\dot\theta^2 \right) -V(r).

The coordinate θ\theta is cyclic because LL does not depend on θ\theta itself. The Euler–Lagrange equation for θ\theta gives

ddt(∂L∂θ˙)=0,\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot\theta} \right) = 0,

or

ddt(mr2θ˙)=0.\frac{d}{dt} \left( mr^2\dot\theta \right) = 0.

Thus

pθ=mr2θ˙p_\theta = mr^2\dot\theta

is conserved. This is angular momentum in planar motion. The example illustrates a general rule: cyclic coordinates produce conserved canonical momenta.

The momentum conjugate to qiq^i is

pi=∂L∂q˙i.p_i = \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot q^i}.

This definition agrees with ordinary momentum for simple Cartesian kinetic energy, but it is more general. In polar coordinates, for example,

pθ=mr2θ˙,p_\theta=mr^2\dot\theta,

not mθ˙m\dot\theta.

When the relation between q˙i\dot q^i and pip_i can be inverted, one can pass from the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian by a Legendre transform. Hamiltonian Mechanics Review shows the Legendre transform step by step. Lagrangian mechanics starts from positions and velocities; Hamiltonian mechanics uses positions and their conjugate momenta.

If a coordinate qaq^a does not appear explicitly in LL, then

∂L∂qa=0.\frac{\partial L}{\partial q^a}=0.

The Euler–Lagrange equation gives

ddt(∂L∂q˙a)=0,\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot q^a} \right) = 0,

so the conjugate momentum pap_a is conserved.

This is the simplest Noether-type statement: a continuous symmetry of the action leads to a conserved quantity. The quantum version appears when continuous unitary symmetries have self-adjoint generators, as in Unitary Representations and Generators.

In the path-integral representation of a propagator, one writes formally

K(qf,tf;qi,ti)=∫q(ti)=qiq(tf)=qfDq exp⁡(iℏS[q]).K(q_f,t_f;q_i,t_i) = \int_{q(t_i)=q_i}^{q(t_f)=q_f} \mathcal Dq\, \exp \left( \frac{i}{\hbar}S[q] \right).

This expression is not an ordinary integral over a finite-dimensional space. It is a limiting construction or formal representation whose precise meaning depends on context. Its central physics lesson is robust: the action supplies the phase.

When action differences across the varied paths are large compared with ℏ\hbar, their phases vary rapidly. An additive constant in SS changes only a common phase. Away from boundaries or singular contributions, stationary phase selects neighborhoods satisfying

δS=0.\delta S=0.

Those stationary paths are classical solutions of the Euler–Lagrange equations. Expanding around them gives the Semiclassical Propagator, fluctuation determinants, and Maslov phases. When the classical action is treated as a function of endpoints, it becomes Hamilton’s principal function; see Hamilton–Jacobi Theory.

For the path-integral construction itself, continue to Why Path Integrals? and Propagators to Path Integrals.

  • Saying “least action” when the action is only required to be stationary.
  • Confusing generalized velocity q˙i\dot q^i with ordinary Cartesian velocity components.
  • Assuming L=T−VL=T-V covers every useful Lagrangian.
  • Dropping endpoint terms without checking the allowed variations.
  • Treating a cyclic coordinate as a coordinate with zero velocity rather than a coordinate absent from LL.
  • Assuming the canonical momentum is always mq˙m\dot q.
  • Forgetting that fixed-endpoint path-integral saddle points are boundary-value solutions, not initial-value trajectories.
  • Quantizing a curvilinear-coordinate Hamiltonian without checking measures and operator ordering.
  1. Derive the Euler–Lagrange equation for the free particle Lagrangian L=(1/2)mx˙2L=(1/2)m\dot x^2.
Solution

The derivatives are

∂L∂x=0,∂L∂x˙=mx˙.\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=0, \qquad \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x}=m\dot x.

The Euler–Lagrange equation gives

ddt(mx˙)=0,\frac{d}{dt}(m\dot x)=0,

so

mx¨=0.m\ddot x=0.
  1. For L=(1/2)mx˙2−V(x)L=(1/2)m\dot x^2-V(x), show that the Euler–Lagrange equation gives Newton’s equation.
Solution

Compute

∂L∂x=−dVdx,∂L∂x˙=mx˙.\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = -\frac{dV}{dx}, \qquad \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x} = m\dot x.

Then

ddt(∂L∂x˙)−∂L∂x=0\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x} \right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0

becomes

mx¨+dVdx=0.m\ddot x+\frac{dV}{dx}=0.

Thus

mx¨=−dVdx.m\ddot x=-\frac{dV}{dx}.
  1. A coordinate qaq^a is cyclic. Prove that its conjugate momentum is conserved.
Solution

Cyclic means

∂L∂qa=0.\frac{\partial L}{\partial q^a}=0.

The Euler–Lagrange equation is

ddt(∂L∂q˙a)−∂L∂qa=0.\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot q^a} \right) - \frac{\partial L}{\partial q^a} = 0.

Therefore

ddt(∂L∂q˙a)=0.\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot q^a} \right) = 0.

Since pa=∂L/∂q˙ap_a=\partial L/\partial\dot q^a, the conjugate momentum pap_a is conserved.

  1. Why does the phase eiS/ℏe^{iS/\hbar} make stationary action relevant to the semiclassical limit?
Solution

Large action differences compared with ℏ\hbar can produce rapid phase variation across a family of paths. Nonstationary contributions then tend to cancel by destructive interference; a large additive constant in the action has no such effect. Near a stationary path, the first variation vanishes, so the phase changes only to second order for small variations. These neighborhoods survive the stationary-phase approximation and give the classical paths in the semiclassical propagator.

  • V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1989.
  • H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, 2002.