Skip to content

An exchange operator is a unitary operator that permutes the slot labels in a many-particle tensor product. For identical particles, those slots are bookkeeping devices rather than observable particle names, so exchange operators are the mathematical language for the symmetry constraints on states and observables.

For two particles, the basic operator is P12P_{12}, which swaps slots 11 and 22. Its eigenspaces with eigenvalues +1+1 and −1-1 are the symmetric and antisymmetric two-particle sectors. For NN particles, the operators U(π)U(\pi) representing permutations π∈SN\pi\in S_N lead to the symmetrizer SN\mathcal S_N and antisymmetrizer AN\mathcal A_N.

The symmetrization postulate selects the physical sector; here we construct the operators that project onto it. Symmetric and Antisymmetric Wavefunctions supplies coordinate-space normalization examples.

Helpful background. Symmetrization Postulate states the sector rule; Operators on Composite Systems explains tensor-factor actions.

Let h\mathcal h be the complete one-particle Hilbert space. On h⊗h\mathcal h\otimes\mathcal h, define the exchange operator P12P_{12} by its action on product vectors:

P12(∣α⟩1∣β⟩2)=∣β⟩1∣α⟩2.P_{12} \bigl( \lvert\alpha\rangle_1\lvert\beta\rangle_2 \bigr) = \lvert\beta\rangle_1\lvert\alpha\rangle_2.

Linearity extends this definition to every vector in h⊗h\mathcal h\otimes\mathcal h. If a general vector is

∣Ψ⟩=∑ijCij ∣i⟩1∣j⟩2,\lvert\Psi\rangle = \sum_{ij} C_{ij}\, \lvert i\rangle_1\lvert j\rangle_2,

then

P12∣Ψ⟩=∑ijCij ∣j⟩1∣i⟩2.P_{12}\lvert\Psi\rangle = \sum_{ij} C_{ij}\, \lvert j\rangle_1\lvert i\rangle_2.

Relabeling dummy summation indices gives

P12∣Ψ⟩=∑ijCji ∣i⟩1∣j⟩2.P_{12}\lvert\Psi\rangle = \sum_{ij} C_{ji}\, \lvert i\rangle_1\lvert j\rangle_2.

Thus, in coefficient language, exchange transposes the coefficient array.

In a coordinate-spin representation with q=(x,s,…)q=(\mathbf x,s,\ldots),

(P12Ψ)(q1,q2)=Ψ(q2,q1).(P_{12}\Psi)(q_1,q_2) = \Psi(q_2,q_1).

The complete one-particle label is exchanged. If spin, polarization, isospin, band index, or another internal label belongs to the one-particle state, it is part of qq.

The exchange operator preserves inner products. For u=∣α⟩1∣β⟩2u=\lvert\alpha\rangle_1\lvert\beta\rangle_2 and v=∣γ⟩1∣δ⟩2v=\lvert\gamma\rangle_1\lvert\delta\rangle_2,

⟨P12u∣P12v⟩=⟨β∣δ⟩⟨α∣γ⟩=⟨α∣γ⟩⟨β∣δ⟩.\begin{aligned} \langle P_{12}u\vert P_{12}v\rangle &= \langle\beta\vert\delta\rangle \langle\alpha\vert\gamma\rangle = \langle\alpha\vert\gamma\rangle \langle\beta\vert\delta\rangle. \end{aligned}

By linearity and continuity, P12P_{12} is unitary on the whole two-slot Hilbert space:

P12†P12=I.P_{12}^\dagger P_{12}=I.

Applying exchange twice returns the original slot order:

P122=I.P_{12}^2=I.

Therefore

P12−1=P12,P12†=P12.P_{12}^{-1}=P_{12}, \qquad P_{12}^\dagger=P_{12}.

So P12P_{12} is both unitary and Hermitian. If ∣Ψ⟩\lvert\Psi\rangle is an eigenvector,

P12∣Ψ⟩=λ∣Ψ⟩,P_{12}\lvert\Psi\rangle = \lambda\lvert\Psi\rangle,

then applying P12P_{12} again gives

λ2∣Ψ⟩=∣Ψ⟩.\lambda^2\lvert\Psi\rangle = \lvert\Psi\rangle.

For a nonzero state, λ2=1\lambda^2=1, hence

λ=±1.\lambda=\pm1.

The λ=+1\lambda=+1 eigenspace is the symmetric two-slot subspace. The λ=−1\lambda=-1 eigenspace is the antisymmetric two-slot subspace.

The symmetric and antisymmetric projectors are

ΠS=12(I+P12),ΠA=12(I−P12).\Pi_S = \frac12(I+P_{12}), \qquad \Pi_A = \frac12(I-P_{12}).

Using P122=IP_{12}^2=I,

ΠS2=14(I+P12)(I+P12)=12(I+P12)=ΠS,\Pi_S^2 = \frac14(I+P_{12})(I+P_{12}) = \frac12(I+P_{12}) = \Pi_S,

and similarly

ΠA2=ΠA.\Pi_A^2=\Pi_A.

They are orthogonal projectors because

ΠSΠA=14(I+P12)(I−P12)=0,\Pi_S\Pi_A = \frac14(I+P_{12})(I-P_{12}) = 0,

and

ΠS+ΠA=I.\Pi_S+\Pi_A=I.

Any two-slot state decomposes uniquely as

∣Ψ⟩=ΠS∣Ψ⟩+ΠA∣Ψ⟩.\lvert\Psi\rangle = \Pi_S\lvert\Psi\rangle + \Pi_A\lvert\Psi\rangle.

For identical bosons, the physical two-particle space is the symmetric part. For identical fermions, it is the antisymmetric part.

Given two one-particle states ∣a⟩\lvert a\rangle and ∣b⟩\lvert b\rangle, the projectors give

ΠS∣a⟩1∣b⟩2=12(∣a⟩1∣b⟩2+∣b⟩1∣a⟩2),\Pi_S \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert b\rangle_2 = \frac12 \bigl( \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert b\rangle_2 + \lvert b\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2 \bigr),

and

ΠA∣a⟩1∣b⟩2=12(∣a⟩1∣b⟩2−∣b⟩1∣a⟩2).\Pi_A \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert b\rangle_2 = \frac12 \bigl( \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert b\rangle_2 - \lvert b\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2 \bigr).

These projected vectors are not automatically normalized. For distinct orthonormal one-particle states, the normalized versions carry the familiar factor 1/21/\sqrt2. If the one-particle states overlap, the normalization changes; if a=ba=b, the antisymmetric projection is zero:

ΠA∣a⟩1∣a⟩2=0.\Pi_A \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2 = 0.

That last equation is the two-slot operator form of the Pauli exclusion principle.

For NN slots, use rightmost-first composition: (πσ)(i)=π(σ(i))(\pi\sigma)(i)=\pi(\sigma(i)). Define the action on product kets by

U(π)∣ϕ1,…,ϕN⟩=∣ϕπ−1(1),…,ϕπ−1(N)⟩.U(\pi)\lvert\phi_1,\ldots,\phi_N\rangle =\lvert\phi_{\pi^{-1}(1)},\ldots,\phi_{\pi^{-1}(N)}\rangle.

Then U(π)U(σ)=U(πσ)U(\pi)U(\sigma)=U(\pi\sigma). In the coordinate wavefunction, the corresponding argument permutation is

(U(π)Ψ)(q1,…,qN)=Ψ(qπ(1),…,qπ(N)).(U(\pi)\Psi)(q_1,\ldots,q_N) = \Psi(q_{\pi(1)},\ldots,q_{\pi(N)}).

The inverse appears in the product-ket ordering, while the coordinate arguments use the forward permutation. Keeping these two actions distinct makes the composition rule consistent. A transposition equals its inverse, which is why this distinction is invisible in two-particle examples.

For a transposition (ij)(ij), U((ij))U((ij)) swaps slots ii and jj. Since any permutation can be written as a product of transpositions, the behavior of a state under pair exchanges determines its behavior under all of SNS_N.

The sign of a permutation is

sgn⁡(π)={+1,π even,−1,π odd.\operatorname{sgn}(\pi) = \begin{cases} +1, & \pi\ \text{even},\\ -1, & \pi\ \text{odd}. \end{cases}

An even permutation is a product of an even number of transpositions; an odd permutation is a product of an odd number. The parity is well-defined even though the decomposition into transpositions is not unique.

Thus a fermionic state does not pick up a minus sign under every nonidentity permutation. It picks up a minus sign under odd permutations and no sign change under even permutations. For example, a three-cycle is even because it can be written as two transpositions.

The NN-particle bosonic symmetrizer is

SN=1N!∑π∈SNU(π).\mathcal S_N = \frac{1}{N!} \sum_{\pi\in S_N} U(\pi).

It projects onto the completely symmetric subspace:

Sym⁡Nh=SN(h⊗N).\operatorname{Sym}^N\mathcal h = \mathcal S_N \bigl(\mathcal h^{\otimes N}\bigr).

The NN-particle fermionic antisymmetrizer is

AN=1N!∑π∈SNsgn⁡(π)U(π).\mathcal A_N = \frac{1}{N!} \sum_{\pi\in S_N} \operatorname{sgn}(\pi)U(\pi).

It projects onto the completely antisymmetric subspace:

∧Nh=AN(h⊗N).\wedge^N\mathcal h = \mathcal A_N \bigl(\mathcal h^{\otimes N}\bigr).

A fixed permutation occurs exactly N!N! times in the double sum over two group elements. Together with the multiplicative sign, this proves

SN2=SN,AN2=AN.\mathcal S_N^2=\mathcal S_N, \qquad \mathcal A_N^2=\mathcal A_N.

For N≥3N\ge3, these two projectors generally do not sum to the identity on the unrestricted tensor product: other permutation-symmetry sectors exist. The ordinary boson/fermion postulate excludes those sectors for the species under discussion. It is additional physical input, not a consequence of permutation invariance alone.

The antisymmetrizer automatically kills any product vector with two identical one-particle factors. If slots rr and ss both carry ∣a⟩\lvert a\rangle, then the transposition (rs)(rs) leaves the product vector unchanged, while antisymmetry demands a minus sign. The only vector compatible with both statements is zero.

This is the operator reason Slater determinants vanish when two columns are identical. The determinant form is developed in Slater Determinants.

For identical particles, a physical observable cannot depend on an arbitrary slot name. The operator condition is

[O,U(π)]=0for all π∈SN.[O,U(\pi)]=0 \qquad \text{for all }\pi\in S_N.

For two slots this becomes

[O,P12]=0.[O,P_{12}]=0.

Equivalently,

U(π)OU(π)−1=O.U(\pi)OU(\pi)^{-1}=O.

This condition says that the observable is invariant under relabeling the formal slots. It does not say that every operator on h⊗N\mathcal h^{\otimes N} is physically available for identical particles.

For example, on h⊗h\mathcal h\otimes\mathcal h,

P12(A⊗I)P12=I⊗A.P_{12}(A\otimes I)P_{12} = I\otimes A.

Therefore A⊗IA\otimes I alone is not exchange-invariant unless it equals I⊗AI\otimes A on the relevant space. The exchange-invariant one-body observable is the symmetric sum

A1+A2=A⊗I+I⊗A.A_1+A_2 = A\otimes I+I\otimes A.

For NN identical particles, the corresponding one-body observable is

∑i=1NAi,\sum_{i=1}^{N} A_i,

where the same one-particle operator AA acts in each slot. Two-body interactions likewise appear as symmetric sums, such as

∑1≤i<j≤NVij,\sum_{1\le i<j\le N} V_{ij},

with the same pair interaction assigned to each pair of identical particles.

If the Hamiltonian is a physical identical-particle Hamiltonian, it commutes with all particle permutations:

[H,U(π)]=0for all π∈SN.[H,U(\pi)]=0 \qquad \text{for all }\pi\in S_N.

Then exchange symmetry is preserved by time evolution. If

U(π)∣Ψ(0)⟩=χ(π)∣Ψ(0)⟩,U(\pi)\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle = \chi(\pi)\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle,

where χ(π)=1\chi(\pi)=1 for bosons or χ(π)=sgn⁡(π)\chi(\pi)=\operatorname{sgn}(\pi) for fermions, then

U(π)e−iHt/ℏ∣Ψ(0)⟩=e−iHt/ℏU(π)∣Ψ(0)⟩=χ(π)e−iHt/ℏ∣Ψ(0)⟩.\begin{aligned} U(\pi)e^{-iHt/\hbar}\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle &= e^{-iHt/\hbar}U(\pi)\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle \\ &= \chi(\pi)e^{-iHt/\hbar}\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle. \end{aligned}

Thus the time-evolved state remains in the same exchange sector. A calculation that starts with a properly symmetric or antisymmetric state will not leave that sector if the Hamiltonian treats the identical particles identically.

Exchange symmetry is sometimes confused with ordinary spatial symmetries. They are different.

For two particles on a line, exchange sends

(x1,x2)⟼(x2,x1),(x_1,x_2)\longmapsto(x_2,x_1),

while parity sends

(x1,x2)⟼(−x1,−x2).(x_1,x_2)\longmapsto(-x_1,-x_2).

These are different transformations on configuration space. A wavefunction can be symmetric under particle exchange and odd under parity, or antisymmetric under exchange and even under parity. The exchange rule concerns particle slots, not reflection through the origin.

  1. Exchange algebra. Use P122=IP_{12}^2=I and unitarity to show that P12P_{12} is Hermitian and has only eigenvalues ±1\pm1.
Solution

Unitarity gives P12−1=P12†P_{12}^{-1}=P_{12}^\dagger. Since P122=IP_{12}^2=I, one also has P12−1=P12P_{12}^{-1}=P_{12}. Therefore P12†=P12P_{12}^\dagger=P_{12}.

If P12∣Ψ⟩=λ∣Ψ⟩P_{12}\lvert\Psi\rangle=\lambda\lvert\Psi\rangle for a nonzero vector, then applying P12P_{12} again gives

∣Ψ⟩=P122∣Ψ⟩=λ2∣Ψ⟩.\lvert\Psi\rangle = P_{12}^2\lvert\Psi\rangle = \lambda^2\lvert\Psi\rangle.

Thus λ2=1\lambda^2=1, so λ=±1\lambda=\pm1.

  1. Projectors. Prove that ΠS=(I+P12)/2\Pi_S=(I+P_{12})/2 and ΠA=(I−P12)/2\Pi_A=(I-P_{12})/2 are orthogonal projectors.
Solution

Using P122=IP_{12}^2=I,

ΠS2=14(I+P12)2=14(I+2P12+I)=ΠS.\Pi_S^2 = \frac14(I+P_{12})^2 = \frac14(I+2P_{12}+I) = \Pi_S.

Similarly,

ΠA2=14(I−P12)2=14(I−2P12+I)=ΠA.\Pi_A^2 = \frac14(I-P_{12})^2 = \frac14(I-2P_{12}+I) = \Pi_A.

Their product is

ΠSΠA=14(I+P12)(I−P12)=14(I−P122)=0.\Pi_S\Pi_A = \frac14(I+P_{12})(I-P_{12}) = \frac14(I-P_{12}^2) = 0.

Since P12P_{12} is Hermitian, both projectors are Hermitian.

  1. Pauli exclusion from projection. Show that ΠA∣a⟩1∣a⟩2=0\Pi_A\lvert a\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2=0.
Solution

By definition,

ΠA∣a⟩1∣a⟩2=12(∣a⟩1∣a⟩2−P12∣a⟩1∣a⟩2).\Pi_A \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2 = \frac12 \bigl( \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2 - P_{12}\lvert a\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2 \bigr).

Since exchanging two identical factors changes nothing,

P12∣a⟩1∣a⟩2=∣a⟩1∣a⟩2.P_{12}\lvert a\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2 = \lvert a\rangle_1\lvert a\rangle_2.

Therefore the two terms cancel and the antisymmetric projection is zero.

  1. Even permutation sign. Write the three-cycle (123)(123) as a product of two transpositions and determine the sign acquired by a fermionic state.
Solution

With the rightmost transposition applied first,

(123)=(12)(23),(123)=(12)(23),

It uses two transpositions, so the permutation is even:

sgn⁡(123)=+1.\operatorname{sgn}(123)=+1.

A fermionic state is therefore unchanged by this even permutation:

U((123))∣Ψ⟩=∣Ψ⟩.U((123))\lvert\Psi\rangle = \lvert\Psi\rangle.

Only odd permutations give a minus sign.

  1. Observable invariance. Let O=A1+A2O=A_1+A_2 with A1=A⊗IA_1=A\otimes I and A2=I⊗AA_2=I\otimes A. Show that [O,P12]=0[O,P_{12}]=0.
Solution

Exchange swaps the two slots:

P12A1P12=A2,P12A2P12=A1.P_{12}A_1P_{12}=A_2, \qquad P_{12}A_2P_{12}=A_1.

Therefore

P12OP12=P12(A1+A2)P12=A2+A1=O.P_{12}OP_{12} = P_{12}(A_1+A_2)P_{12} = A_2+A_1 = O.

Multiplying on the right by P12P_{12} and using P122=IP_{12}^2=I gives P12O=OP12P_{12}O=OP_{12}, hence [O,P12]=0[O,P_{12}]=0.

  1. Time evolution. Suppose [H,P12]=0[H,P_{12}]=0 and P12∣Ψ(0)⟩=η∣Ψ(0)⟩P_{12}\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle=\eta\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle with η=±1\eta=\pm1. Show that the exchange eigenvalue is preserved in time.
Solution

Since [H,P12]=0[H,P_{12}]=0, P12P_{12} also commutes with e−iHt/ℏe^{-iHt/\hbar}. Thus

P12∣Ψ(t)⟩=P12e−iHt/ℏ∣Ψ(0)⟩=e−iHt/ℏP12∣Ψ(0)⟩=ηe−iHt/ℏ∣Ψ(0)⟩=η∣Ψ(t)⟩.\begin{aligned} P_{12}\lvert\Psi(t)\rangle &= P_{12}e^{-iHt/\hbar}\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle\\ &= e^{-iHt/\hbar}P_{12}\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle\\ &= \eta e^{-iHt/\hbar}\lvert\Psi(0)\rangle\\ &= \eta\lvert\Psi(t)\rangle. \end{aligned}

The state remains in the same symmetric or antisymmetric sector.

  • L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 2014.
  • C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
  • P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 1958.
  • A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems, Dover, 2003.
  • A. M. L. Messiah and O. W. Greenberg, “Symmetrization Postulate and Its Experimental Foundation”, Physical Review 136, B248–B267 (1964).
  • J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  • R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.