Skip to content

Entangled States: A First Definition

An entangled pure state describes a whole whose parts cannot each be assigned a separate pure-state vector. Entanglement is a property of the joint preparation relative to a specified subsystem split; it is not a force between the parts. The full treatment of entangled states includes broader criteria and the mixed-state qualifications.

Helpful background. Product states gives the factorization test used here.

For a specified bipartition A∣BA|B, a pure state is entangled when no local vectors satisfy

∣Ψ⟩AB=∣ψ⟩A⊗∣ϕ⟩B.|\Psi\rangle_{AB}=|\psi\rangle_A\otimes|\phi\rangle_B.

The Bell state

∣Φ+⟩=∣00⟩+∣11⟩2|\Phi^+\rangle=\frac{|00\rangle+|11\rangle}{\sqrt2}

has coefficient matrix C=I/2C=I/\sqrt2, of rank two, so it cannot factor. In contrast, ∣+⟩A∣−⟩B|+\rangle_A|-\rangle_B is product despite containing several computational-basis terms.

For an entangled bipartite pure state, both reduced states are mixed. For this Bell state they are I/2I/2: either subsystem gives equal probabilities in every orthonormal qubit basis. The joint state still contains correlations that the local density operators alone cannot specify.

The mixed state

ρmix=12∣00⟩⟨00∣+12∣11⟩⟨11∣\rho_{\mathrm{mix}}=\frac12|00\rangle\langle00| +\frac12|11\rangle\langle11|

also gives perfectly correlated computational-basis outcomes, but it is a classical mixture of product preparations and is therefore separable. For mixed states, “not a product” is weaker than “entangled”: entanglement means that no convex mixture of product states represents the density operator.

Neither entanglement nor conditioning on a remote outcome permits signaling by an unread local measurement. The complete local instrument leaves the other subsystem’s marginal unchanged; local observables explains this calculation.

Compare the expectation of X⊗XX\otimes X in ∣Φ+⟩|\Phi^+\rangle and ρmix\rho_{\mathrm{mix}}, where XX interchanges ∣0⟩|0\rangle and ∣1⟩|1\rangle. Why does this comparison require both subsystems?

Solution

X⊗XX\otimes X interchanges ∣00⟩|00\rangle and ∣11⟩|11\rangle, leaving ∣Φ+⟩|\Phi^+\rangle unchanged, so its expectation is 11. Each product term in ρmix\rho_{\mathrm{mix}} has expectation zero, so the mixture gives 00. Both preparations have the same reduced states I/2I/2, and therefore every single-subsystem measurement agrees. This joint observable distinguishes these two preparations; its value alone is not a universal entanglement test, since ∣++⟩|++\rangle also has expectation 11.

  • M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th anniversary ed., Cambridge University Press, 2010, ch. 2.
  • J. Watrous, The Theory of Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, 2018, ch. 6. Author’s manuscript.