Nondegenerate Perturbation Theory
Nondegenerate time-independent perturbation theory computes how an isolated eigenvalue and its eigenstate change when a Hamiltonian is changed slightly.
Write
where is exactly solved and is a bookkeeping parameter. The unperturbed eigenvalue equation is
The level must be simple and separated by a positive gap from the rest of the spectrum, including any continuum. For self-adjoint operators, the perturbation must also define a suitable common-domain or quadratic-form family; an isolated level alone does not justify a power series for an arbitrary unbounded perturbation. The formulas below apply to a sufficiently smooth eigenvalue branch, or as a formal asymptotic expansion when convergence has not been established.
Required background. Use eigenvalues and eigenstates to project the eigenvalue equation and spectral decomposition to resolve the identity.
Expanding an isolated eigenvalue
Section titled “Expanding an isolated eigenvalue”Seek an eigenvalue and eigenstate of
as formal expansions:
and
The physical perturbation may be obtained by setting after the order counting is clear, but this is safe only if the corresponding dimensionless ratios are small.
Intermediate Normalization
Section titled “Intermediate Normalization”A common convention is intermediate normalization:
This implies
This condition fixes the component of parallel to . Other normalization conventions are possible. Energy corrections do not depend on this convention, but state-correction formulas do.
Order-by-Order Equations
Section titled “Order-by-Order Equations”Substituting the expansions into the eigenvalue equation and matching powers of gives, at first order,
Projecting with gives the first-order energy correction:
Using the shorthand
this is
For symmetry tests, sign checks, parameter-response interpretation, and focused examples, see First-Order Energy Corrections.
First-Order State Correction
Section titled “First-Order State Correction”Project the first-order equation onto with :
Thus
This formula is the first place energy-gap denominators appear. Small denominators are a warning sign, not a detail to ignore.
For normalization and phase conventions, observable corrections, selection-rule diagnostics, exact checks, and the geometric interpretation of this vector, see First-Order State Corrections.
Second-Order Energy Correction
Section titled “Second-Order Energy Correction”The second-order energy correction is
This formula is one of the main workhorses of bound-state perturbation theory. Its sign depends on whether the coupled states lie above or below the state being corrected.
For a ground state, all other unperturbed energies satisfy , so every term in is nonpositive.
For the derivation, reduced-resolvent form, sign theorem, static-polarizability connection, continuum terms, and convergence diagnostics, see Second-Order Energy Corrections.
For the all-order recursion, third-order subtraction structure, convergence radius, asymptotic truncation, and the switch to subspace diagonalization, see Higher-Order Structure.
For the historical identity, normalization conventions, repartitioning, comparison with Brillouin–Wigner theory, and atomic and molecular uses of the order-by-order method, see Rayleigh–Schrödinger Perturbation Theory.
Validity Criterion
Section titled “Validity Criterion”A useful diagnostic is
Small individual are necessary for weak mixing in each channel. Also check their sum: many small amplitudes can produce a large state correction,
Continuum contributions require spectral integrals. This first-order diagnostic does not prove convergence of the full series. For bounded , a conservative sufficient condition for the isolated spectral subspace to remain separated is , where is the unperturbed gap.
If the perturbation has nonzero matrix elements connecting nearly degenerate levels, diagonalize the coupled subspace instead.
Worked Two-Level Check
Section titled “Worked Two-Level Check”Consider
with and . For the lower level, and
The exact lower eigenvalue is
Expanding for gives
matching the perturbative result.
What the Method Computes Well
Section titled “What the Method Computes Well”Nondegenerate perturbation theory is excellent for small shifts of isolated levels, weak mixing between well-separated states, and expectation-value corrections when state corrections are included consistently.
It is not automatically reliable for wavefunction details, near-degenerate levels, tunneling splittings, or observables sensitive to high-energy tails.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Show that if , the first nonzero energy correction may be second order.
Solution
The first-order correction is
If , this term vanishes. The second-order correction is
This can be nonzero if the perturbation couples to other unperturbed states.
- For the two-level Hamiltonian above, explain why the perturbation expansion fails when .
Solution
The second-order correction contains
As , this correction diverges, indicating that the assumed unperturbed basis is no longer a good starting point. One must diagonalize the coupled two-state subspace, which is degenerate perturbation theory in the limit.
References
Section titled “References”- C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Laloë, Quantum Mechanics, Wiley, 1977.
- A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Dover, 1999.
- J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2020.
- R. Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Springer, 1994.